cal30_sniper
WKR
I’d also add that I don’t reload for .223. The 77gr factory loads I’ve tried have all been around 2650-2700 from the 20” barrel. That really only carries 1800fps out to about 500yds at my elevation. Assuming a 100fps velocity loss to 16” (which is a solid assumption with .223), that does limit to about 400yds even at a mile elevation.I don’t want to be argumentative but in the interest of sound advice, I have to point out that my 20” 223 can push the TMK at about 2800 FPS, which keeps it above 1800 FPS out to 580 yards where I hunt.
Chopping 4 inches off will drop that velocity around 100 FPS to about 2700 FPS and that means the effective range for hunting is now about 500 yards where I hunt.
Certainly there are better choices for true long-range hunting but for the OP, if you won’t be hunting past 400 yards, there’s really no downside to a 16” barrel on the 223.
I was really noticing the limitation of even the 20” shooting near sea level in southern AZ this spring.
Edit to add: I went back and looked at my chrono data for 16” Ruger Gunsite and 20” Tikka. There was a 185fps loss for the one 77gr load that I had data for both of them on. That’s not insignificant, but some of it could be differences in chamber/bore dimensions that I’m not sure how one would account for.


