wapitispokes
FNG
I'm a little late on this post, but also a new member. Thought I should offer up my experience with bullheads, in case it is helpful to anyone.
I've had 3 over the years and I'll comment on the RRS. I too love RRS "stuff" and I have had a BH-40 ballhead for over a decade. Far and away the best bullhead I have owned. It is a keeper. But I do not recommend it for spotting scopes.
I have used it with light spotters, heavy spotters and for general photography.
The BH-40 has its advantages in terms of form factor (minimal bulk), reasonable weight (about a pound). Plus, it does have a pan feature which works fine.
However, IMO, it is a PIA using it with a spotting scope. The friction adjustment is inadequate for a long heavy object and the scope will "flop" whenever you loosen the ball to move the scope and you'll have a very hard time moving the scope a small amount without either no friction and flop risk, or jerky movement. At least I do. It is nearly impossible to find a friction level that provides the user with smooth movement and enough friction to avoid the "flop". I call it being "sticky" or "grabby".
For my use, if all I'm going to do is quickly look at a single animal that is not moving and if it is easy to point the scope at the object, the head would be adequate. It works fine for range work (but most anything does). Great for cameras. Should work fine for binos (but probably still "floppy" depending on Bino weight). That's just my experience. I am baffled that RRS markets it as ideal for spotting scopes on medium weight tripods.
I have not used a fluid head yet, but that is what I am moving to for the spotter. I'll be ordering the Va-5 fluid pan head soon and I'm looking forward to the comparison. The Va-5 is reported to are in the same weight range as the BH-40, but it is bulkier.
I've had 3 over the years and I'll comment on the RRS. I too love RRS "stuff" and I have had a BH-40 ballhead for over a decade. Far and away the best bullhead I have owned. It is a keeper. But I do not recommend it for spotting scopes.
I have used it with light spotters, heavy spotters and for general photography.
The BH-40 has its advantages in terms of form factor (minimal bulk), reasonable weight (about a pound). Plus, it does have a pan feature which works fine.
However, IMO, it is a PIA using it with a spotting scope. The friction adjustment is inadequate for a long heavy object and the scope will "flop" whenever you loosen the ball to move the scope and you'll have a very hard time moving the scope a small amount without either no friction and flop risk, or jerky movement. At least I do. It is nearly impossible to find a friction level that provides the user with smooth movement and enough friction to avoid the "flop". I call it being "sticky" or "grabby".
For my use, if all I'm going to do is quickly look at a single animal that is not moving and if it is easy to point the scope at the object, the head would be adequate. It works fine for range work (but most anything does). Great for cameras. Should work fine for binos (but probably still "floppy" depending on Bino weight). That's just my experience. I am baffled that RRS markets it as ideal for spotting scopes on medium weight tripods.
I have not used a fluid head yet, but that is what I am moving to for the spotter. I'll be ordering the Va-5 fluid pan head soon and I'm looking forward to the comparison. The Va-5 is reported to are in the same weight range as the BH-40, but it is bulkier.