Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have been using these in my tikka 6.5creed and tikka 223 and they have worked perfect. over 100rnds in both no issues
Homepage - Mag3D.ca
3D printed rifle magazines. A functional and affordable alternative to factory magazines. Free shipping within Canada on orders over $125mag3d.ca
I have been shooting 75gr eldm and 147gr eldm in them as well as pmc x tac green tip 62gr 5.56
What is the major gain from .169 to .240? The challenge I saw was are you hand loading or single feeding. Due to magazine le gth restrictions I found the 223 wylde freebore to be enough to seat out for typical magazine. Most magazines on the long end are 2.5 and 2.55. For reliable feeding you need to seat them back a little under the max coal of the magazine. Thats my thoughts. If we are trying to get more powder capacity I think you need to just go to 22 gt.223rem with the 88&90s looks like .230 freebore would be ideal. 169 freebore bullets are seated to deep. These are pics from the urban riflemen smith with the 90vlds bergers touching the lands with his reamers. First pic is 169 freebore second is 230 freebore
View attachment 935230
View attachment 935231
What is the major gain from .169 to .240? The challenge I saw was are you hand loading or single feeding. Due to magazine le gth restrictions I found the 223 wylde freebore to be enough to seat out for typical magazine. Most magazines on the long end are 2.5 and 2.55. For reliable feeding you need to seat them back a little under the max coal of the magazine. Thats my thoughts. If we are trying to get more powder capacity I think you need to just go to 22 gt.
Yes sir. I have a wylde chamber which i believe is .169. My 88s are 20 thousandths off with a coal of 2.505. This will work in some aics mags or the waters and mountain tactical or nd magazines. If you go longer you're restricted to certain magazines. If you ever plan to run aics the longer throat will not provide benefit. But how much benefit do you actually get with the longer throat? I would argue a 223 build is not for speed. If you want more speed there are other options. If I did .240 id be 2.576 oal that would be close enough to the end of my magazine (2.6 coal) that is could cause things to bind up. 2.6 is veery long for a 223. You'll find out why very quickly why that catridge was designed for a coal of 2.25. Long 223 magazines are not fun to load. The shoulder has to go past the feed lips making it challenging to load.I can’t answer, as I’m currently debating what to do. But the Waters magazines solve for single feeding the long loads.
Yes sir. I have a wylde chamber which i believe is .169. My 88s are 20 thousandths off with a coal of 2.505. This will work in some aics mags or the waters and mountain tactical or nd magazines. If you go longer you're restricted to certain magazines. If you ever plan to run aics the longer throat will not provide benefit. But how much benefit do you actually get with the longer throat? I would argue a 223 build is not for speed. If you want more speed there are other options. If I did .240 id be 2.576 oal that would be close enough to the end of my magazine (2.6 coal) that is could cause things to bind up. 2.6 is veery long for a 223. You'll find out why very quickly why that catridge was designed for a coal of 2.25. Long 223 magazines are not fun to load. The shoulder has to go past the feed lips making it challenging to load.