Question about Credo HX

[Rdpe21]

I like it. For shooting at dots (load dev, zeroing) its fantastic, and in my opinion slightly easier to center on the target spot. For stuff like shooting at plates, animals, etc - i don't think a crosshair (duplex, milquad, etc) is at all a hindrance.
As an example, the SWFA 3-9 has a fairly thick crosshair compared to the SWFA 10x and Trij 2.5-10, and I dont find it to be an issue at all.

As an aside, and not something you asked about, I'm moving towards all FFP. I do like the Credo HX, and it was my first dialing scope about 1.5 years ago, but I've found that a good FFP reticle does away with the annoyance of trying to use SFP sub tensions at lower mag ranges...I really like shooting at 6x-10x for the 100-400 yard shooting I mostly do.

All good information thanks!

 

[SDHNTR]

I have both, on rifles I don’t use much anymore since moving to FFP, but that said, I’d challenge anyone to get behind either in a field situation and find one meaningfully noticeable difference.

 

[1000yards]

All good information thanks!

@Sponge experience mirrors my own. The Credo HX is a great scope. And if all I ever did was shoot white tails from a stand then I'd be set. But knowing what I know now about a mil ffp system, I would have bought something else. Notice that for long range work, people often make the switch from moa to mils, but it hardly ever goes in the other direction.