- Thread Starter
- #21
Ha, yes I do, but I love building customs for myself.Don't you sell Seekins rifles? The Havok Element is the "easy" button friend.
Dave
Your not the first to tell me that ;-)
Ha, yes I do, but I love building customs for myself.Don't you sell Seekins rifles? The Havok Element is the "easy" button friend.
Dave
I would love to see how your Tikka 7PRC comes out. I'm thinking about doing a short barreled Tikka 7PRC as well.I'd probably go with a Proof, Bartlein, or Benchmark if you are going with a blank. Nothing against C6, just think that one of their big advantages is the affordability of their prefits.
I love my 300PRC Christensen Ridgeline, but I wish it had a 22" barrel like what you are getting. That's a tough package to beat if you are dead set on a 30 cal. I'm building a 7prc 18" Tikka to replace it currently tho.
Check out this build posted recently.I would love to see how your Tikka 7PRC comes out. I'm thinking about doing a short barreled Tikka 7PRC as well.
Ha, yes I do, but I love building customs for myself.
Your not the first to tell me that ;-)
Can you explain on going steel on the >6.5? What does the steel do the carbon does not?
Does this include non magnums, like the 308 win?
3 shots or 10 shots?My best barrel is a Proof Sendero. .300 prc. She’s a one holer.
Those are all 6-12 shot groups. That best one is 10. Shot that this morning.3 shots or 10 shots?
Very nice! You are wasting her talent on paper.Those are all 6-12 shot groups. That best one is 10. Shot that this morning.
Definitely. Still trying to work out a bit more ES than I’d like. That’s why she’s still been on paperwork.Very nice! You are wasting her talent on paper.
Looks great. I assume all were same POA (middle)? If so, this is a great example of the "group size" discussion in the "your groups are too small". All great, but total dispersion would give an effective group size much bigger than any of the individual groups. Thanks for posting. This was very informative to me.Those are all 6-12 shot groups. That best one is 10. Shot that this morning.
Not really, those were all shot in varying stages of fine tuning the zero and over two sessions. First group was top right after settling on the load. Moved two clicks left and shot lower left group. Too much, and one called yank to the right. Adjusted one click back right and one click down. Stopped there for the day. Then on day two shot that best group on top left, with a slight low bias. I moved up one click and shot the group on bottom right. By then there was some mirage and I was getting a bit fatigued.Looks great. I assume all were same POA (middle)? If so, this is a great example of the "group size" discussion in the "your groups are too small". All great, but total dispersion would give an effective group size much bigger than any of the individual groups. Thanks for posting. This was very informative to me.