Super interesting, and brings up some interesting questions. Anyone ever used an NV "horns longer than ears" antelope tag on a doe? Doe tags in states like WY should be good to go on any doe regardless of horn length, right?
So WY is "doe/fawn" not "anterless" so any pronghorn that has female parts down south is legal regardless of how long the horns are. The fawn part is a bit wishy washy in WY if its a buck fawn. Fawn is "a young of the year antelope". Bucks are "male antelope with visible horns and dark cheek patch at the base of the ear." I self inquired/reported when I shot a buck fawn once because the regs in WY leave a lot of gray there (where as CO for instance clearly says a buck <5" horns is considered legal under the doe tag). Anyways the game warden was a bit critical of the one I shot, making me sweat a bit, (it had ~3/4" of horn showing above the hair and I clearly considered if a fawn) saying there was some black on its face but in the end said he'd consider it a fawn. I had shot it at 350yds and didn't see the black and was surprised seeing the set of nuts when I rolled it over, lol. Going forward I've avoided any trace of black on the face if I can help it and so far haven't dropped another buck fawn.