Anello
Lil-Rokslider
I've carried a S&W 329 PD (44 mag) and it is fantastic to carry. Light and not bulky/uncomfortable ... but don't plan on placing any follow up shots. It jumps a bit. I've gone back to my Glock 20 as I can actually shoot it straight and it carries well. Honestly, a sidearm in non-grizz territory is more of a tool than anything. Helps me sleep better and is good for protection from bad (2) legged folks.
As far as performance goes, I've used both in tight quarters on angry boars and did notice a bit of a difference. The .44 put the pig down conclusively, whereas the 10 MM required a follow up shot. Now, if I had to shoot the .44 again I would have been in trouble, as I can't hit the side of a barn on shot #2 with that thing and it is quite possible that the follow up shot with my 10 MM was not necessary as it happened so fast. So, take it with a grain of salt. But, that is my experience.
If you can shoot a .44 better than I can, and you are in big bear country, go with the .44. If you are like me, and shoot Glocks far better than revolvers, then go with a Glock 10 MM of your choice or any other manufacturer of the 10 MM.
As far as performance goes, I've used both in tight quarters on angry boars and did notice a bit of a difference. The .44 put the pig down conclusively, whereas the 10 MM required a follow up shot. Now, if I had to shoot the .44 again I would have been in trouble, as I can't hit the side of a barn on shot #2 with that thing and it is quite possible that the follow up shot with my 10 MM was not necessary as it happened so fast. So, take it with a grain of salt. But, that is my experience.
If you can shoot a .44 better than I can, and you are in big bear country, go with the .44. If you are like me, and shoot Glocks far better than revolvers, then go with a Glock 10 MM of your choice or any other manufacturer of the 10 MM.
Last edited: