Poacher Gets Prison & Big Fine

DanimalW

WKR
Joined
Feb 9, 2020
Messages
395
They’ll probably never see a penny of that restitution. How do they expect a convicted felon to come up with over $300k? Rob a bank?
 

bcv

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
129
Caught Poacher stories always come across as getting off easy.. to me anyway.
This guy gets to hunt in 5 years.
 

5MilesBack

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
16,131
Location
Colorado Springs
Feel free to logic you way into [having a tag = having a big huge dead buck].
Nobody said anything about "big huge" dead bucks........but an animal is an animal. Does Kansas price them like high fence hunts......different price points based on their antler size? That would get interesting........low tag prices but state imposed trophy fees figured "after the fact". Don't give them any ideas.
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2015
Messages
6,253
Location
Lenexa, KS
Nobody said anything about "big huge" dead bucks........but an animal is an animal. Does Kansas price them like high fence hunts......different price points based on their antler size? That would get interesting........low tag prices but state imposed trophy fees figured "after the fact". Don't give them any ideas.

Well you equated a tag to a dead animal. I’m still trying to figure that one out.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
1,025
Location
Colorado
Nobody said anything about "big huge" dead bucks........but an animal is an animal. Does Kansas price them like high fence hunts......different price points based on their antler size? That would get interesting........low tag prices but state imposed trophy fees figured "after the fact". Don't give them any ideas.

Here’s Colorado’s menu, with sizes and prices...if you’re so inclined, for when idiots do idiotic things.

The fines for poaching trophy-size animals, as defined by the following measurements, are:
• Pronghorn antelope with a horn length of 14 inches or more $4,000
• Bull elk with six or more points on an antler beam $10,000
• Whitetail deer buck with an inside antler spread of 18 inches or more $10,000
• Mule deer buck with an inside antler spread of 22 inches or more $10,000
• Any bull moose $10,000
• Any mountain goat $10,000
• Bighorn sheep with a horn length of one-half curl or more $25,000
 
OP
Outdoor Writer
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
832
Location
Glendale, AZ
So why is he not doing ten years as felon in possession of a firearm...from my limited understanding that is a federal offense.
He was likely convicted under state law. It appears to qualify under Federal statute, it must include all three elements, so the felon must cross state lines. See Element C

QUICK REFERENCE TO FEDERAL FIREARMS LAWS

I. POSSESSION OF A FIREARM OR AMMUNITION BY A PROHIBITED PERSON:

18 USC § 922{g} & {n} . Punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment. May receive minimum sentence of 15 years without parole if offender has three or more prior convictions for a felony crime of violence (e.g. burglary, robbery, assault, possession of offensive weapons) and/or drug trafficking felony.

Elements:

A. Possession or receipt of a firearm or ammunition;

B. By a subject who falls within one of the following categories:

Felon - (Additionally, persons awaiting trial on felony charges are prohibited from receiving firearms.);

Drug user or addict - (Often shown where paraphernalia seized, subject tests positive for drugs and/or subject claims drugs were possessed for personal use.);

Alien - (Includes illegal aliens and aliens lawfully admitted under non-immigrant visas, i.e., those aliens not admitted for permanent residence. This provision does not prohibit aliens who lawfully possess a so-called “green card” from possessing guns or ammunition.);

Is subject to a domestic restraining order - (The order must prohibit contact with an intimate partner, or child of the subject, and must have been issued only after a hearing of which the subject was notified and at which the subject had an opportunity to participate. The order must also find the subject poses a threat to the physical safety of the intimate partner or child or must prohibit the use, threatened use or attempted use of physical force.);

Has a prior conviction for domestic assault - (Includes a prior conviction for any assault or threatened use of a deadly weapon against a present or former spouse or partner or child or guardian of any such person. The subject must have been entitled to a jury trial and been represented by counsel in the prior proceeding or be shown to have waived those rights.);

Fugitive from justice - (Fled any state to avoid being prosecuted or to avoid testifying in any criminal proceeding.); or Dishonorably discharged from the military; AND

C. The firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line at any time.
 
Last edited:
OP
Outdoor Writer
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
832
Location
Glendale, AZ
Here's the quote......"Blick was assessed three hundred ten thousand two hundred thirty-four dollars and sixty-eight cents ($310,234.68) in restitution that is owed to the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism for the value of the deer killed".

Says that's just for the "value" of the deer killed. So a KS deer tag (even NR tag) is an absolute bargain for such expensive deer. They can probably raise their tag prices if they're that valuable.
(b) (1) In addition to any other penalty prescribed by law, the unlawful intentional taking of a trophy big game animal shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $5,000.
(2) A trophy big game animal shall include any animal meeting the following criteria: (A) An antlered whitetail deer having an inside spread measurement of at least 16 inches; (B) an antlered mule deer having an inside spread measurement of at least 20 inches; (C) an antlered elk having at least six points on one antler; or (D) an antelope having at least one horn greater than 14 inches in length.
(3) In addition to any other penalty prescribed by law, the defendant shall pay the restitution value of any deer, elk or antelope taken in violation of K.S.A. 32-1001, 32-1002, 32-1003, 32-1004, 32-1005 or 32-1013, and amendments thereto, with a gross score of more than 125 inches for deer, 250 inches for elk and 75 inches for antelope. Such restitution value shall be in an amount not less than the value prescribed for such animal in K.S.A. 32-1005, and amendments thereto. The restitution value for deer shall equal: (gross score - 100)² x $2. The restitution value for elk shall equal: (gross score - 200)2 x $2. The restitution value for antelope shall equal: (gross score - 40)2 x $2. The gross score shall be determined by taking measurements as provided by rules and regulations of the secretary, which shall be made to the nearest 1/8 of an inch using a 1/4 inch wide flexible steel tape. All restitution collected pursuant to this subparagraph shall be paid into the state treasury and shall be credited to the wildlife fee fund created by K.S.A. 32-990, and amendments thereto. (4) Antlers or horns may be measured pursuant to the manner described in subsection (b)(3) at any time; no drying time is required.
 
OP
Outdoor Writer
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
832
Location
Glendale, AZ
Nobody said anything about "big huge" dead bucks........but an animal is an animal. Does Kansas price them like high fence hunts......different price points based on their antler size? That would get interesting........low tag prices but state imposed trophy fees figured "after the fact". Don't give them any ideas.
judy.gif

Living in Colorado where Samson's law originated way back in 1998 and has been copied by many other states, including Kansas, you should know better.

 
Last edited:

Squincher

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
634
Location
Midwest
He was likely convicted under state law. It appears to qualify under Federal statute, it must include all three elements, so the felon must cross state lines. See Element C

QUICK REFERENCE TO FEDERAL FIREARMS LAWS

I. POSSESSION OF A FIREARM OR AMMUNITION BY A PROHIBITED PERSON:

18 USC § 922{g} & {n} . Punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment. May receive minimum sentence of 15 years without parole if offender has three or more prior convictions for a felony crime of violence (e.g. burglary, robbery, assault, possession of offensive weapons) and/or drug trafficking felony.

Elements:

A. Possession or receipt of a firearm or ammunition;

B. By a subject who falls within one of the following categories:

Felon - (Additionally, persons awaiting trial on felony charges are prohibited from receiving firearms.);

Drug user or addict - (Often shown where paraphernalia seized, subject tests positive for drugs and/or subject claims drugs were possessed for personal use.);

Alien - (Includes illegal aliens and aliens lawfully admitted under non-immigrant visas, i.e., those aliens not admitted for permanent residence. This provision does not prohibit aliens who lawfully possess a so-called “green card” from possessing guns or ammunition.);

Is subject to a domestic restraining order - (The order must prohibit contact with an intimate partner, or child of the subject, and must have been issued only after a hearing of which the subject was notified and at which the subject had an opportunity to participate. The order must also find the subject poses a threat to the physical safety of the intimate partner or child or must prohibit the use, threatened use or attempted use of physical force.);

Has a prior conviction for domestic assault - (Includes a prior conviction for any assault or threatened use of a deadly weapon against a present or former spouse or partner or child or guardian of any such person. The subject must have been entitled to a jury trial and been represented by counsel in the prior proceeding or be shown to have waived those rights.);

Fugitive from justice - (Fled any state to avoid being prosecuted or to avoid testifying in any criminal proceeding.); or Dishonorably discharged from the military; AND

C. The firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line at any time.
The felon doesn't have to cross state lines, just the firearm or ammo. So, unless the firearm and ammo were both manufactuered in the same state where the felon possessed them, "C" is automatically met. Chances are the case just wasn't presented to the feds.
 

5MilesBack

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
16,131
Location
Colorado Springs
Living in Colorado where Samson's law originated way back in 1998 and has been copied by many other states, including Kansas, you should know better.​
You're talking about the fines imposed after the fact for poaching. We had already passed that up and were on to discussing tag prices and the "value" of said animals. Yes, I know and understand the Sampson Law.
 
OP
Outdoor Writer
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
832
Location
Glendale, AZ
The felon doesn't have to cross state lines, just the firearm or ammo. So, unless the firearm and ammo were both manufactuered in the same state where the felon possessed them, "C" is automatically met. Chances are the case just wasn't presented to the feds.
I didn't interpret it that way, but you're likely correct.
 
OP
Outdoor Writer
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
832
Location
Glendale, AZ
You're talking about the fines imposed after the fact for poaching. We had already passed that up and were on to discussing tag prices and the "value" of said animals. Yes, I know and understand the Sampson Law.
Yup. I wasn't the one who convoluted the thread by comparing the cost of tags to fines imposed on lawbreakers. Two separate & distinct issues. Using your convoluted logic, the cost of a each share of stock that was manipulated by an inside trader nailed by the Feds should equal the fine he was assessed.
 

TSAMP

WKR
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Messages
1,633
So I read this and it peeked my interest on perceived value on these animals for the state. Wyomings yearly revenue for hunting and fishing is 88.5 million on average. Now down to hunting, specifically license revenue was 43.5 million for non residents. 9.5 million for residents. 77 percent of revenue comes from non res.

I think this might help understand how the state came to the tally they did for the fine. They view the wildlife as the money maker it is.

Im aware this didnt happen in WY. Just had these metrics handy.
 
OP
Outdoor Writer
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
832
Location
Glendale, AZ
So I read this and it peeked my interest on perceived value on these animals for the state. Wyomings yearly revenue for hunting and fishing is 88.5 million on average. Now down to hunting, specifically license revenue was 43.5 million for non residents. 9.5 million for residents. 77 percent of revenue comes from non res.

I think this might help understand how the state came to the tally they did for the fine. They view the wildlife as the money maker it is.

Im aware this didnt happen in WY. Just had these metrics handy.
Good point.
 
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
56
If love to see a follow up story on this guy in ten years and see what he’s doing, what he’s paid and if he still hunting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2021
Messages
25
That much violating should have gotten a lifetime ban on hunting. But with the new felony expungement thing in our near future he could be hunting from the comfort of his pickup in a few years
 
OP
Outdoor Writer
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
832
Location
Glendale, AZ
That much violating should have gotten a lifetime ban on hunting. But with the new felony expungement thing in our near future he could be hunting from the comfort of his pickup in a few years
Apparently under Kansas law, 5 yrs. is the max for hunting privilege suspensions. The 5 yr. will apply to all states within the compact.

(3) Upon the third or a subsequent such conviction, the court shall order forfeiture of the person's hunting privileges for five years from the date of conviction and: (A) Revocation of the person's hunting license, unless such license is a lifetime hunting license; or (B) if the person possesses a lifetime hunting license, suspension of such license for five years from the date of conviction.
 

DudeBro

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
256
Location
Virginia
I like how the game wardens dog has its own badge on its collar.

This is often required for the enhanced criminal offenses and/or sentencing guidelines for offenses like “assaulting a law enforcement officer.” The dogs are technically LEOs and therefore attacking them gets the same charge/sentence as attacking a human LEO.
 
Top