I hunted Pine Ridge for turkeys a couple years ago, definitely saw some whitetail but weren't really looking for them either. I hunt whitetail every year up in CT, but there we hunt on the mountain and the deer make a mostly honestly living on acorns, forbs etc, not ag land.
Help me start to conceptualize how/where whitetails use the landscape in the pine ridge Nebraska area. I'll tell you what I think so far, and how I'd like to hunt. And then maybe you guys can correct me or add to my knowledge. I'm used to backcountry hunting so I'm eager to use that ability to hike and hunt more remote areas to my advantage if possible. Although it doesn't look like you can get more than a couple miles from most roads.
There's four kinda areas that I'm mentally breaking the landscape down into. There's public fields and open areas bordering private ag, there's major river bottoms, creek bottoms that are probably dry, and there's the hills. I'm kinda thinking of staying out of the hills to be honest, as I don't have a tag for muleys. Do you think this is a mistake? I know WT use the hills too, but I'm wondering if percentage wise I'm going to see many, and without a lot of prior scouting not sure I'll know where to look.
As far as river bottoms and creek bottoms. Is it worth packing in to creek beds that have broadleaf trees but are obviously dry some or most of the year? These are the most remote areas I can find, but is the pay off worth it? Or should I stick to just rivers that have actual water while I'm hunting.
How tightly should I be sticking to public adjacent to ag? White on rice? Or is it just something to look at first? I'll be bowhunting for a few days to get the lay of the land and then switching over to rifle for 3 or 4 days as well. I'd really like to get into a saddle for archery, but I'm thinking the only viable place for that would be river bottom.
Help me start to conceptualize how/where whitetails use the landscape in the pine ridge Nebraska area. I'll tell you what I think so far, and how I'd like to hunt. And then maybe you guys can correct me or add to my knowledge. I'm used to backcountry hunting so I'm eager to use that ability to hike and hunt more remote areas to my advantage if possible. Although it doesn't look like you can get more than a couple miles from most roads.
There's four kinda areas that I'm mentally breaking the landscape down into. There's public fields and open areas bordering private ag, there's major river bottoms, creek bottoms that are probably dry, and there's the hills. I'm kinda thinking of staying out of the hills to be honest, as I don't have a tag for muleys. Do you think this is a mistake? I know WT use the hills too, but I'm wondering if percentage wise I'm going to see many, and without a lot of prior scouting not sure I'll know where to look.
As far as river bottoms and creek bottoms. Is it worth packing in to creek beds that have broadleaf trees but are obviously dry some or most of the year? These are the most remote areas I can find, but is the pay off worth it? Or should I stick to just rivers that have actual water while I'm hunting.
How tightly should I be sticking to public adjacent to ag? White on rice? Or is it just something to look at first? I'll be bowhunting for a few days to get the lay of the land and then switching over to rifle for 3 or 4 days as well. I'd really like to get into a saddle for archery, but I'm thinking the only viable place for that would be river bottom.