Did it die
Of course it did, doesn’t mean it’s a bullet I’d use again, or trust on a larger animal than deer.
I’ve killed antelope with a Sierra Match King, doesn’t mean it’s a good bullet for hunting, but I won’t be using it again either.
Did it die
139 scenar without hesitation
So, if you drew a very favorable elk tag and you had a 14-year-old girl who can shoot the hell out of her Winchester Model 70 Featherweight Compact in 6.5 Creedmoor, what bullet would you use for her to have a crack at a big bull from 25 - 500 yards?
I’ll tune it to her rifle, for sure. Shots will most likely be over 100 yards. I have great confidence she’ll put it where it needs to go from nearly any angle.
What bullet would you choose? Not based on what your rifle likes best, but based on what you’d want up the spout when a true trophy bull makes himself available.
I’m leaning 143 ELD-X because I’ve only heard very good things about its performance, except for those who have made a bad shot then blamed the poorly-aimed bullet for its “lack of performance.”
I can certainly be swayed by experience. Tell me what you’d use if given a choice and no other constraints. Thanks!
A barnes bullet would not be my choice for this and I love their LRX line-- the 6.5cm isn't a good cartridge choice for that bullet at distance. The creed doesn't give you velocity for expansion or energy at distance.
Why choose something that is marginal when there are much better options specifically for elk like the Partition or Accubond.
I don’t want to feed lead to my young kids and the LRX opens to 1600fps.
Look at the energy generated by a 6.5cm from a 127LRX at those velocities and tell me if you're comfortable shooting an elk...
300 yards you are at 1500ft/lbs
500 yards you are at 1100ft/lbs but 2000fps
By the time you get to 1600fps you have less than 700ft/lbs of energy... I wouldn't shoot a deer at that let alone an elk.
I'm not arguing with copper as a bullet choice, I'm just suggesting a better cartridge than the 6.5cm for using a Barnes bullet on an elk.
Speer gold dots.. bonded bullet at half the cost of partitions
Look at the energy generated by a 6.5cm from a 127LRX at those velocities and tell me if you're comfortable shooting an elk...
300 yards you are at 1500ft/lbs
500 yards you are at 1100ft/lbs but 2000fps
By the time you get to 1600fps you have less than 700ft/lbs of energy... I wouldn't shoot a deer at that let alone an elk.
I'm not arguing with copper as a bullet choice, I'm just suggesting a better cartridge than the 6.5cm for using a Barnes bullet on an elk.
I’d expect a complete pass-through on elk from that Barnes bullet impacting at 2000fps.Look at the energy generated by a 6.5cm from a 127LRX at those velocities and tell me if you're comfortable shooting an elk...
300 yards you are at 1500ft/lbs
500 yards you are at 1100ft/lbs but 2000fps
By the time you get to 1600fps you have less than 700ft/lbs of energy... I wouldn't shoot a deer at that let alone an elk.
I'm not arguing with copper as a bullet choice, I'm just suggesting a better cartridge than the 6.5cm for using a Barnes bullet on an elk.
Look at the energy generated by a 6.5cm from a 127LRX at those velocities and tell me if you're comfortable shooting an elk...
300 yards you are at 1500ft/lbs
500 yards you are at 1100ft/lbs but 2000fps
By the time you get to 1600fps you have less than 700ft/lbs of energy... I wouldn't shoot a deer at that let alone an elk.
I'm not arguing with copper as a bullet choice, I'm just suggesting a better cartridge than the 6.5cm for using a Barnes bullet on an elk.
Documentation? This seems unlikely since Speer lists ver different sizes and weights from what Federal uses in the Fusion lineup.The Speer Gold Dots is actually what Federal Ammo use for their "Fusion" Bullets...Hence....Federal Fusion Line Up!