OnX Imagery On-Demand

[Fowl Play]

Anyone tried this feature yet? At $60 a pop, I figured I would give it a shot just to see. Waited 2 weeks and just got an auto refund saying the imagery failed. I don't need it as the standard imagery is fine for my area, but was just curious. Anyone else had success with this feature?

 

[Pgohil]

I was part of the beta test group. It worked out really well. I was very pleased with it. I do think it's expensive, but if you feel like the latest imagery would make a difference in your hunt it would be money will spent.

PGohil
WV

 

[Fowl Play]

I was part of the beta test group. It worked out really well. I was very pleased with it. I do think it's expensive, but if you feel like the latest imagery would make a difference in your hunt it would be money will spent.

PGohil
WV

Is it any higher resolution than the standard basemap?

 

[Pgohil]

No, same resolution as regular

 

[wapitibob]

Too small of an area to be of use to me.

 

[Fowl Play]

Too small of an area to be of use to me.

Yeah, I’d guesstimate each request is roughly 1500 acres. I could see use case being to see current snow conditions OR get an aerial view of some newly made food plots back east, etc

 

[BuckRut]

I as well was part of the beta. Super cool feature but I haven't come across a reason for me to drop $60 to get another one especially with the addition of the low quality recent imagery option which is more that sufficient to check snow levels, burns or other stuff like that.

 

[riversidejeep]

I was also one of the guinea pigs, The image I received was terrible, they resent another just as bad. The regular image was three times as clear for me.