New TMK announced

[RockAndSage]

View attachment 993635Are we in for some education?!?

Kindly with regards, is a hotdog a sandwich?

Also, can we haz Temu 77gr TMKs?

 

[RockAndSage]

The 77gr TMK was engineered specifically for the 5.56 in an AR.

Eh...

Post in thread 'Sus FNGs and newly active posters - post them here'

Monday at 7:54 PM

The hotdog question in question.

• Taudisio

 

[Chris in TN]

Also, can we haz Temu 77gr TMKs?

If you’re talking about those American Bullet Company 77TMKs from Creedmoor sports, yeah I’d take more of those too.

 

[wind gypsy]

I’ve still shot more tmks in an AR than bolt gun but I agree it does impact powder choice and they are deep at 2.25”. Still work good though!

 

[KY_coop]

Ive been wondering lately if anyone has barreled a 7mm08 with a twist that could accommodate 180s and what their velocities have been. Its hard to even find a load for 180s in a 7mm08, but someone has had to have done it.

Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk

Ive read of people pushing 180's out of 7mm08 with staball 65. I cant remember where I read it or what the barrel specs were but I remember it was really close to what my 22" 284 could push a 180 eldm

 

[Neil84]

I’m looking forward to trying the 6.5 153gr pills in my 6.5 prc. Love how the 168gr “terminal murder kings” work in my 308 so these should be well impressive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Timjohnson11]

To save me from reading 20 pages, do we know the BC of the 107 TMK (.243/6mm)?

 

[wind gypsy]

To save me from reading 20 pages, do we know the BC of the 107 TMK (.243/6mm)?

no.

 

[khuber84]

This is spitballing, but a pointed 115 non nose ring dtac regualry trues out at 310g7 and the 115 tmk is right at 290, 7% reduction. I've shot a lot of 107 pointed smk, and a 280g7 has always done very well for me, so with that notion, I have a feeling it'll land somewhere in the low 260s for a g7, which is similar to where the 108eldm has lined up in the limited use I've shot them.

 

[8nbait]

That would be disappointing

 

[khuber84]

That would be disappointing

I was hoping the 115-117gr was going to be higher as well. I think all these heavy tmk are going to be a lil lower bc than we are hoping for due to the design and prioritization of other attributes VS max bc.

 

[mxgsfmdpx]

I was hoping the 115-117gr was going to be higher as well. I think all these heavy tmk are going to be a lil lower bc than we are hoping for due to the design and prioritization of other attributes VS max bc.

Good.

 

[Ryan Avery]

This is spitballing, but a pointed 115 non nose ring dtac regualry trues out at 310g7 and the 115 tmk is right at 290, 7% reduction. I've shot a lot of 107 pointed smk, and a 280g7 has always done very well for me, so with that notion, I have a feeling it'll land somewhere in the low 260s for a g7, which is similar to where the 108eldm has lined up in the limited use I've shot them.

I shot the NR DTAC over AB's Doppler; it had the G7 at .292. I have shot over 3000 rounds out of a 6UM using this number and never had issues validating these bullets well past 1000 yards.

The TMKs will be better than .260