Too much scope. A 2-10x will work better all around. Kinda hard to recommend which without knowing budget. It's a lot easier to hit at 30/06 distance with a 10x than it is to get on target at spitting distance with a 4.5x.
Nothing wrong with an /06. Kicks about the same as a 270 WSM or .264 Win Mag or others that drift less in wind though.
Most of the more economical rifle choices are poor quality. Modern manufacturing methods can make a poor quality rifle that will work fine for low volume use by a hunter. Just be aware that what you get in a Sauer is much easier to use and longer lived than a Savage.
All things considered, I'd put more money on the scope and mount than the rifle. Those less expensive rifles like the Ruger American will do all you need, but you will find similarly cheap scopes and mounts lacking.
Nothing wrong with an /06. Kicks about the same as a 270 WSM or .264 Win Mag or others that drift less in wind though.
Most of the more economical rifle choices are poor quality. Modern manufacturing methods can make a poor quality rifle that will work fine for low volume use by a hunter. Just be aware that what you get in a Sauer is much easier to use and longer lived than a Savage.
All things considered, I'd put more money on the scope and mount than the rifle. Those less expensive rifles like the Ruger American will do all you need, but you will find similarly cheap scopes and mounts lacking.