New Backfire Lightweight Hunting Chassis?

It did seem like BF took some shots at the rokstok in his marketing video.

He featured the rokstok in his SHOT show recap years ago and was intrigued by the pad being above the bore.

In his chassis video he mentions his recoil pad geometry was above the bore for better shoot ability, but added that the folder was a solution for cleaning rods because it folded out of the way.
 
What are thoughts on this chassis in comparison to some of the other ones on the market? I’ve no experience with a chassis but stumbled onto this one. Price is in Canadian bucks so not priced to bad. Not to derail thread, just thought it was an interesting comparison.
 
What are thoughts on this chassis in comparison to some of the other ones on the market? I’ve no experience with a chassis but stumbled onto this one. Price is in Canadian bucks so not priced to bad. Not to derail thread, just thought it was an interesting comparison.

I can’t comment on that product specifically, but my interactions with that company have been great. I’ve purchased five different sets of bottom metal from them and the quality has always been outstanding.
 
What are thoughts on this chassis in comparison to some of the other ones on the market? I’ve no experience with a chassis but stumbled onto this one. Price is in Canadian bucks so not priced to bad. Not to derail thread, just thought it was an interesting comparison.

First glance - the cheek piece looks to be forward of where I’d actually make contact with it and the barely existent fore end is dumb.
 
WTF is the deal with having a short ass fore end on the bottom and full length handguard above the barrel? Does he realize the support comes from below the barrel? Dumb!
The support comes from the "mini chassis" or on most stocks right around the recoil lug and back. If your barrel is free floated like it should be, nothing past that point is supporting anything. It only adds weight and one could make an argument for added rigidity overall but I doubt that is true either. The only thing the forend portion of a stock or chassis is for is to mount a bipod/tripod, and to have somewhere to grip or rest the rifle. He accomplishes the grip part by adding a carbon fiber hand guard of sorts.
 
I was a shit talker of backfire for a while. Jim seems to have grown with experience and I think he’s an asset to the hunting rifle industry/community now days.

What’s up with the area around the recoil lug on that thing though? Where does the front screw go?
I totally agree im not interested in all his content but have no problem with him or his channel. Im building a savage axis 280AI backpack rifle that does't have a budget for the previous 2 options so hell yes i'm listening.
 
The support comes from the "mini chassis" or on most stocks right around the recoil lug and back. If your barrel is free floated like it should be, nothing past that point is supporting anything. It only adds weight and one could make an argument for added rigidity overall but I doubt that is true either. The only thing the forend portion of a stock or chassis is for is to mount a bipod/tripod, and to have somewhere to grip or rest the rifle. He accomplishes the grip part by adding a carbon fiber hand guard of sorts.

I'm not talking about how a stock holds an action. I'm talking about the fore end which exists to aid the shooter of the rifle in supporting the rifle while holding or shooting. It's fooking stupid to have a fore end that is longer above the barrel than where its magnitudes more useful - below the barrel unless it's already quite long. Nobody holds a gun up from a mirage shield/hand guard above the barrel.

2 things:
1. The closer front support is to trigger, the less stable it is. Bipod or front rest further forward = more stable.
2. If you have a bipod mounted on the fore end but find yourself in a shooting position where you're using a different front rest (pack, bag, tree, etc), a short fore end leaves you with very little smooth real estate to use on said rest.
 
Back
Top