New arrow help: smaller diameter worth the hassle?

FuddRucker

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Oct 13, 2023
Messages
182
Hey everyone,

I'm down to six good arrows after using the same dozen for a few years and thinking about getting a new dozen. Currently using VF TKO (standard diameter), but curious about moving to .204 because the RIP TKOs are highly touted.

My question is: do the benefits of smaller diameter shafts outweigh the fiddle factor of dealing with outserts that damage easily or HIT inserts which sound like a PITA to install? Or should I stick to standard? Ideally I'd like something where I can easily play around with insert weights to find out my preferred balance between arrow weight/trajectory.

Use is for both Western big game and whitetail. I had a self imposed max range of 60 on my mule deer hunt this year, but practicing to hopefully extend that by 10 in the future.

Thanks for your input.
 
I went from 5mm(red Sd's) to 4mm.
I went with Element Storm arrows with Nexxus outnserts. I think I'm around 460-465 with a 125grn head.
There are other threads in detail on this, and lots of opinions both ways.
In theory, the smaller the diameter, the less wind effect and better penetration.
I haven't had any real issues, but I don't do a lot of tinkering. I ordered them cut with outserts glued on and went shooting.
The only issue I've had with the outsert is that they are tough to pull out of bag targets.
 
Ideally I'd like something where I can easily play around with insert weights to find out my preferred balance between arrow weight/trajectory.
Threaded weights that screw in to the backside of the insert are the easiest way to tinker with front end weight. Weight screws are available for 4mm/.166” and 5mm/.204” arrows but require the use of half-outs (instead of HIT’s). With standard diameter arrows (6.5mm/.245”), you can use a flanged, fully-seated insert and also use weight screws. IMO the juice isn’t worth the squeeze with smaller-than-standard diameter arrows.
 
Back
Top