raisins
FNG
This is the first time I've mounted my own scope on a high powered deer rifle (on 22 LRs and 5.56s I've put scopes on there's not enough recoil for the issue below to have come up). This is a Tikka Superlite in 6.5 Creedmoor. It has a Trijicon Credo 3-9X40 scope on it mounted with a 1 piece DNZ game reaper mount. I have torque wrench, Wheeler leveling kit, and gun vise. And the mechanics of all that and squaring the reticle is not problem.
I always felt on my other deer rifles (all given to me with scopes already on) that on the highest scope power I really had to overly stretch to get rid of the black ring around the sight picture. I read that you should set the scope on highest power and shoulder it naturally and set the scope as far away as you can and still get a clear picture in that posture.
That's what I did and it forced me to set the front scope ring 1/8" from the front objective bell because I didn't want to mess with bedding a pic rail and then using 2 piece mounts that I would probably want to lap. Wanting to keep it simple.
This worked fine until I got my new Tenebraex scope covers and went to the range today. These are the ones that need a friction fit adapter for this scope and so the ring cover when open adds at least about 0.667 inches to the back of the scope. These things are chunky and overbuilt.
I was shooting relaxed with my nondominant hand on the rear sand bag and squeezing off surprise shots.
EVERY single shot the ring of the Tenebraex scope cover at least touched my nose/glasses/brow. And one time it hit it pretty good...no blood though.
I know I'm going to get a flinch if I keep this up.
With the way the scope is set now, I feel I am so relaxed and not straining forward to get into the scope that when it goes off that all the slack being taken up in my body (because I'm not stretched forward) allows the scope to slide back a bit much.
I like the clear scope covers and wanted them because I hunt in some nasty weather sometimes. But it seems my options are: get rid of the Tenebraex rear scope cover or slide my scope forward in the rings so I'm stretched out more.
Please advise. Pic of the rifle attached. There's a bubble level on the tube behind the front ring. Thanks.
I always felt on my other deer rifles (all given to me with scopes already on) that on the highest scope power I really had to overly stretch to get rid of the black ring around the sight picture. I read that you should set the scope on highest power and shoulder it naturally and set the scope as far away as you can and still get a clear picture in that posture.
That's what I did and it forced me to set the front scope ring 1/8" from the front objective bell because I didn't want to mess with bedding a pic rail and then using 2 piece mounts that I would probably want to lap. Wanting to keep it simple.
This worked fine until I got my new Tenebraex scope covers and went to the range today. These are the ones that need a friction fit adapter for this scope and so the ring cover when open adds at least about 0.667 inches to the back of the scope. These things are chunky and overbuilt.
I was shooting relaxed with my nondominant hand on the rear sand bag and squeezing off surprise shots.
EVERY single shot the ring of the Tenebraex scope cover at least touched my nose/glasses/brow. And one time it hit it pretty good...no blood though.
I know I'm going to get a flinch if I keep this up.
With the way the scope is set now, I feel I am so relaxed and not straining forward to get into the scope that when it goes off that all the slack being taken up in my body (because I'm not stretched forward) allows the scope to slide back a bit much.
I like the clear scope covers and wanted them because I hunt in some nasty weather sometimes. But it seems my options are: get rid of the Tenebraex rear scope cover or slide my scope forward in the rings so I'm stretched out more.
Please advise. Pic of the rifle attached. There's a bubble level on the tube behind the front ring. Thanks.