Need a Scope Before October—What Would You Choose?

[cuerro viejo]

I've read a few instances where to get a good sight picture the Maven has to be mounted far forward in the rings. Have you observed this?

No not at all.

 

[UncleNommies]

No not at all.

Good deal, thank you!

 

[ColPenguin]

I've read a few instances where to get a good sight picture the Maven has to be mounted far forward in the rings. Have you observed this?

The RS1.2 has a very forgiving eye relief. Very similar to the eye relief on both SWFA 3-9 or 3-15. They can be mounted forward to be comfortable to get behind either prone or offhand. Nobody wants it so close that it risks knocking them in the eye socket under recoil.

I could be way out of line, correct me if I am wrong. I think some people may run into mounting problems with certain rings and mounting systems. It depends on where the turret housing falls dimensionally on a particular scope. For example, if one is using dovetail rings that depend on recoil lug position that might really limit position where one mounts the ring. That fixed ring position might not work well with the dimensions of a particular scope. Certain rings, scope and mounting system when combined may not fit well for best function.

I always use a picatinny rail. I have not personally run into this problem of mounting a scope so far forward that it impinges the ring on the outside of a turret housing. A picatinny rail is a part that can come loose, or fail, if not mounted or bonded securely to the action. It is a more flexible mounting system, however.

If you're mounting system doesn't work with a scope. Change your mounting system, not the scope. Rings and rails are cheaper than scopes.

 

[WRO]

I just quickly looked it up on Eurooptics and that's awesome, 2.5-20 zoom with a 50mm objective lens.

They eyebox is trash compared to the maven and they’re a bitch to mount unless you have a pic rail.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[sndmn11]

Aimpoint PRO and get the shoot 2 hunt, or whatever other scope you like later on.

 

[UncleNommies]

The RS1.2 has a very forgiving eye relief. Very similar to the eye relief on both SWFA 3-9 or 3-15. They can be mounted forward to be comfortable to get behind either prone or offhand. Nobody wants it so close that it risks knocking them in the eye socket under recoil.

I could be way out of line, correct me if I am wrong. I think some people may run into mounting problems with certain rings and mounting systems. It depends on where the turret housing falls dimensionally on a particular scope. For example, if one is using dovetail rings that depend on recoil lug position that might really limit position where one mounts the ring. That fixed ring position might not work well with the dimensions of a particular scope. Certain rings, scope and mounting system when combined may not fit well for best function.

I always use a picatinny rail. I have not personally run into this problem of mounting a scope so far forward that it impinges the ring on the outside of a turret housing. A picatinny rail is a part that can come loose, or fail, if not mounted or bonded securely to the action. It is a more flexible mounting system, however.

If you're mounting system doesn't work with a scope. Change your mounting system, not the scope. Rings and rails are cheaper than scopes.

I had originally planned on using the Unknown Munitions Tikka rings which do utilize recoil lugs. That was my concern if the scope needed positioned further forward! I think im narrowed down between the Maven Rs1.2 and the SWFA 3-9. I just need to make my mind up at this point!

 

[UncleNommies]

They eyebox is trash compared to the maven and they’re a bitch to mount unless you have a pic rail.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do appreciate that info! I am not going to be using a pic rail, rather UM tikka rings.

 

[UncleNommies]

Aimpoint PRO and get the shoot 2 hunt, or whatever other scope you like later on.

I dont think I would benefit from a red dot scope at distance for the time being, I could be wrong, never had one! There is a strong chance I will be getting in on the S2H scope regardless!

 

[Matt5266]

SWFA 3-9. Maven is not needed for your use case imo. The SWFA won't hold you back either from shooting further than 200 yarda either.

 

[ecollier123]

Vortex viper hd in 3x15 has done me well the last few years.

 

[sndmn11]

I dont think I would benefit from a red dot scope at distance for the time being, I could be wrong, never had one! There is a strong chance I will be getting in on the S2H scope regardless!

200yd avg...
"Could be wrong", yep.
Cut your 308 barrel down to 16" and you will have a perfect setup for what you describe.

 

[Giacchik]

I have a NXS 5.5-22x56 with Geissele super precision I’d let go

 

[UncleNommies]

200yd avg...
"Could be wrong", yep.
Cut your 308 barrel down to 16" and you will have a perfect setup for what you describe.

"This rifle's primary purpose is hunting eastern whitetail in the mountains (max ~200 yards). I also want the capability to take it out West and confidently stretch things out for extended range shots if the situation calls for it."
I think you missed this part in post #1. I know a 16" .308 would be excellent for my Eastern hunting, but I'm intentionally building a rifle that can also handle Western hunts without feeling under equipped at longer distances.

 

[UncleNommies]

I have a NXS 5.5-22x56 with Geissele super precision I’d let go

I do appreciate the offer, but that is a little more scope than I need! Good luck with the sale!