Magnus i and Polar are better imo, but you won't find any of the 3 for even 3x the OP's $700 budget.Indeed the v8 is top of the mountain imo.
Alas! omitted in my comment the persons budget.Magnus i and Polar are better imo, but you won't find any of the 3 for even 3x the OP's $700 budget.
Glass may be a little better on vx-5hd than accupoint, but accupoint illumination and reliability are better.Buy both scopes and take to your hunting area to compare, then return the one you like the least.
This avoids wondering if you made the right choice. Any costs to do this should be regarded as the cost of buying some certainty.
In my opinion, a scope is the one thing you don’t want to economize on. If you can’t see them you can’t shoot them.
May want to save more money and get something in the $1k range, although I have a trijicon accupower 2.5-12x56 (I think) which was a lot better than a Leupold vx3 in marginal light. The Leupold vx5 beats the trijicon , glass is just better. I have no experience with meopta. Anything else I can think of is out of your $$ range.
From personal experience, neither will eventually prove satisfactory.Glass may be a little better on vx-5hd than accupoint, but accupoint illumination and reliability are better.
If I could only hunt to 30 minutes after sunset, I might use all 56mm Accupoints.From personal experience, neither will eventually prove satisfactory.
Luison‘s Advice above is where I ended up after economizing on cheaper scopes before eventually buying the Swaro. I probably would have spent much less overall if I bought the best to begin with
When you buy great quality scopes, you can usually get at least 50% of price back when you sell it. That’s for a beat up one. Not uncommon to get even more.
With the price points he cited, I initially didn’t want to push him into blowing past his budget constraints.
A lot of deer are killed with cheaper scopes too. Just harder.