Don't ever look at numbers for Christensen then. You were also wrong in your numbers. 2% vs 3%. Not 3v3. No one is perfect and he admitted as such. You can strive to be perfect all the time, and you'll be short multiple times. It's just life. But whatever you like. All of their rifles I've had hands on shot extremely well. Someone with a manufacturing background should be the first to admit that 100% perfection isn't attainable.
True no one in mass production can meet zero defects. However any QC director who stood up in front of a board of directors and read what Seekins posted would be summarily fired. His comments were very defensive and he tried to compare to previous model failures as an acceptable reason for the new model defects. Hell your supposed to get better over time not worse.
I have to disagree with you here. I see valid points to both sides of the argument but, having spoken personally with Glen Seekins- all I can say is that he is a stand up everyday, average guy who started his empire from the ground up. From the service I have gotten from him directly, it's clear to me that he really does care about his customers. It was a post from him personally and I have to admit that his writting skills and message relaying are not his strong points. He's just a normal guy with A LOT on his plate who will stand behind his product. That's how I read his comments regarding the failure rate. I also don't imagine his company being filled with employees that are top of their class in the public relations world etc. So he wrote it himself... which I like about him and his approach. I've written worst things.
That was my exact experience as well. They refused to shoot a 10 round group when I requested it.
If he’s an average guy ….then he needs to hire above average professionals to run his QC department. Good luck on yours
Thank you
