GrayMatter
FNG
Looking mighty fine!
Check out pattern makers vise, I line the jaws with 1/2” felt works very nice for stock work
I appreciate the recommendations on finishes fellas, finishing is a trade in itself im finding. My favourite so far is a tung oil finish, done properly with wet sanding to fill pores, and bare hand rubbing until it burns a layer of skin off ( exaggerating, kinda)
Tbh I always put tru oil in the gimmick category, but after bs’ing with a old time stock maker who’s used it all, tru oil sounds like a great product, either by itself or as a base and modified how one likes his finish.
Another great finisher, for sealing, saturates the whole stock in spar urethane, lets it dry a week or two then sands it down to wood, leaving the pores filled. I can’t help but think though that a guy might get a glitter looking finish maybe, though I can see how that system would seal and harden the wood quite well.
I’m not sure there’s enough time in a lifetime to try them all lol.
True, and more than one way to skin that cat. As someone posted, maybe best to find one you like
And learn to manipulate that well, rather than keep experimenting. I never liked true oil, still dont, and yet some exceptional stockers use it and it seems to look and handle great.
I always found a glossy finish was pretty easy, an “in the wood” finish also pretty easy but not durable or weather resistant, so the trick for me was finding the best balance. Ive tried a lot of finishes, and ime its really difficult to keep a built up finish looking “satin” over time, as hand oils and use slicks it up and it glosses-up over time. Re: the soaking in urethane then sanding back—its a lot of work, but this is actually where ive landed as well. I use waterlox (a very hard oil modified urethane floor finish) cut at least 50:50 with spirits to seal for several coats, then you can fill the pores with a slurry using the same finish, let it dry very well so it's fully cured, then cut it back to bare wood using water as a sanding lubricant. The water is critical because if you have even a tiny amount of buildup on the wood surface, that will become a glossy spot in the eventual finish, and using finish as a lubricant prevents identifying these built-up spots. I think the remaining built up spots, or possibly that finish in the pores, is the “glittery” effect you refer to, but this method results in a very hard, well-sealed wood surface that repels water pretty well, takes stain or dye evenly, that will then take a rubbed finish very well without being too built up. If you sand in that finish with a slurry to fill pores and then cut back before your topcoats, the sanding dust in the pores prevents them from being shiny and you can use whatever topcoat you want to achieve your desired durability, look, etc. i like BLO cut with turp and japan dryer for absolute best look, but its very soft, so field guns I’ll use a modern finish like benmatte or similar for top coats. I actually have a turkey gun I did for myself like this, it got the full meal deal seal/fill treatment with the modern stuff, then pure BLO thinned and with japan dryer for top coats. The finish is still soft from abrasion like the oil always is, but it has held up well due to the undercoats, is quite waterproof, and its super easy to touch up the topcoat. (Plus, its the worlds classiest 870 express!)
Regardless, I really, really like your work. Really classic lines with a personal touch, looks fantastic and well done. This is fun to follow along, and it makes me happy to hear you will checker it!
Don’t forget to protect the wood under the recoil pad!
Glad to see you getting into the checkering! Cant have those luscious stocks naked.
@Decker9 on the overruns—not sure what “textbook” is, but for a fill pattern like that I leave the border uncut and taped—I use automotive pinstripe tape for this so I can flex it into a curve, or the non-flexible plastic tape made for embossed lettering for straight lines. I’ll do full-depth checkering only to within 1/8” or 3/16” from the border. Then go back and finish the checkering with a “pull” stroke using the tip of your cutter so you cant over-run the tape. I’ll cut the actual border last using the tape as a guide, which will also clean up any tiny overruns.
They're only imperfections if you see it that way. I'd love to make my own stock. One of these days. I've thought about building a duplicator but I'm not sure it'd be worth it
The wider cutter spreads that line out a bit to chew up little overruns, OR connects lines that dont quite connect. I used some of the mullering cutters and didnt really care for them. My own taste is mostly point patterns and simple lines with single borders—I just use a regular cutter for borders, but Id have to look if its a 75 or 90 degree. I am no pro, I just use the dembart cutters and figure I go through several cutters on each stock, I usually plan for at least 1 single line cutter and at least one double cutter per panel, and then replace them so they stay sharp, especially if you fill pores with anything other than sanding dust and finish. Looking online it appears the dembart cutters arent even really available as much and have about quadrupled in price since I last looked…hopefully my supply is robust!I need to figure out something for borders. I seen Ullman’s mentioning he checkers with 90 degree, then cut his boarder with a 75 degree. I coulda swore I had a border cutter, but can’t see it in my little pile here.
What do you prefer for cutting the boarder? Or does it depend on the pattern?
The panel on the opposite side Iv been stopping short, so far so good with only 1-2 overruns, but Iv got a little ways to go still on it. By the time this panel is done, I’m hoping I can nail the center panel. I’m going to grid it out in hopes of keeping my lines straighter too.
I did a mullered border for a guy who was turning his beretta into a british “best” lookalike on a woodward grip, I figured the border looked right on that. Fleur probably is right on a winchester. My personal stuff is various flavors of simple: (and you’ll still see an overrun or two if you look close)
View attachment 670475