In Idaho residents can no longer buy left over non resident tags. So while the non resident quota has not changed the number of non residents buying those tags has. The YouTube hunters, a few of whom do put out a nice product and seem like good guys, will say the same thing you have about non resident tag quotas. Then in the next breath they’ll mention there are no longer non resident tags left over.
I don’t know how else you get to the point of non resident tags selling out without more non residents. The same group will whine on a public video of how Idaho has changed their tag allocation system when their own business plan is based on new hunter recruitment and making it easy for people to find and apply for tags.
I also understand the argument about having a decent well spoken advocate for hunting and think it has merit. And I think that SOME of the above mentioned media hunters fit that description.
But the reduced hunting opportunity is real in several situations through harder draws, more non residents, and more residents including more “new” residents. Maybe that price is worth it for these quality advocates, I’m not sure.