Montana Wolves - looking for real-world perspectives

I would have to disagree with this statement. I guess i like wild places and knowing wild animals are there.
Not everyone needs safe places.

My point was related to management of big game species.

Additionally, just because you want other predators to exist, doesn’t mean they need to exist. Man is the apex predator on this planet. Other animals exist only because we choose to let them.

I can agree with you that it is nice to have some other predators around. Generally someplace far away from people. But they are not at all necessary for anything.

And when it comes to having some other predators around, I am a total NIMBY. And I expect most people to feel the same way as I do. I am very happy to live where I don’t have to worry about predators eating my kids, cattle, dogs, chickens, etc. I think most people feel that way as well. I am not going to exterminate every last predator around me, but I choose to live in a neighborhood free of brown bears, wolves, and mountain lions. The black bears, coyotes, raccoons, and etc. can stick around as long as they don’t get too uppity.

So, given that, I am not going to ever support putting them in someone else’s backyard.
 
Here in Alaska some folks were concerned that there weren't enough moose in certain areas.

Alaska Dept of Fish and Game conducted browse surveys to determine the percentage of available browse that was consumed over the winter. If areas that were previously known to support more moose had a high percentage of browse available at the end of the winter, predation (by wolves and bears) was assumed to be the cause of the declining moose population. Poor calf survival is another key metric of high predation they considered.

Some of the areas with a declining moose population and poor calf survival were subjected to intensive wolf and bear harvest which generally speaking resulted in increased moose populations. The predator control programs are controversial of course. Predator populations seem to recover quite quickly when control programs end which causes some folks to say is proof they don't work.
 
I'm highly suspect of new members posting about wolves.

I my experience there is almost always an alternative motive.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
No motive other than trying to figure out my stance. I've carried a wolf tag hunting the last 2 years and have gotten both agreement and guff from others that I've talked about it with (guff coming mostly from non-hunters). I don't really have enough info and don't feel like I've talked to enough people who i believe have info to have a strong stance myself, but if im going to carry a wolf tag/harvest one, I'd like to do so from a defensible position. Figured this wasn't a bad place to get input.
 
No motive other than trying to figure out my stance. I've carried a wolf tag hunting the last 2 years and have gotten both agreement and guff from others that I've talked about it with (guff coming mostly from non-hunters). I don't really have enough info and don't feel like I've talked to enough people who i believe have info to have a strong stance myself, but if im going to carry a wolf tag/harvest one, I'd like to do so from a defensible position. Figured this wasn't a bad place to get input.

How is your rifle resting on the back of your neck? Your photo looks very sus in a few ways as mentioned
 
How is your rifle resting on the back of your neck? Your photo looks very sus in a few ways as mentioned
Knew this forum could be cynical, but didn't know I'd have to prove my rifle carry to show im not a bot or some sort of political insurgent.... Rests between my frame and pack brain. Ive carried that way ever since I got the pack 3 years ago as long as im moving through open country. My bad for posting on such a charged topic i guess.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20251130_182227.jpg
    IMG_20251130_182227.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 17
Knew this forum could be cynical, but didn't know I'd have to prove my rifle carry to show im not a bot or some sort of political insurgent.... Rests between my frame and pack brain. Ive carried that way ever since I got the pack 3 years ago as long as im moving through open country. My bad for posting on such a charged topic i guess.

Don't let it get to you. And, respect for searching out opinions.

Please know that this forum does regularly get targeted for information warfare by Russia and other hostile actors - they set up accounts and do things similar to what you did in starting this thread, albeit usually with a bit less fluency in hunting culture. But it's a common thing, and they do it with strategic intent, to influence and bend audiences. Often with multiple accounts, each presenting a different point of view, but coordinated for specific effects. Even innocent original posts serve as bait - those are the kinds of openings they look for, over time.
 
Don't let it get to you. And, respect for searching out opinions.

Please know that this forum does regularly get targeted for information warfare by Russia and other hostile actors - they set up accounts and do things similar to what you did in starting this thread, albeit usually with a bit less fluency in hunting culture. But it's a common thing, and they do it with strategic intent, to influence and bend audiences. Often with multiple accounts, each presenting a different point of view, but coordinated for specific effects. Even innocent original posts serve as bait - those are the kinds of openings they look for, over time.
Thats's crazy, I had no idea. The idea being that it all falls into the search algo even if its complete B.S.? I guess thats how i came accross rokslide so many times myself and finally decided to join, but almost all of my rokslide lurker experience came from gear research, not conservation or politics.

Thanks for the info. Now I'm questioning the responses that i liked...

I can see how it looks odd coming from a FNG like that though. I thought the profile picture would lend me some cred rather than further skepticism lol but that makes total sense. In hindsight, I probably should have held off on posting about something so charged. If a mod wants/needs to pull it down, totally understand.
 
My point was related to management of big game species.

Additionally, just because you want other predators to exist, doesn’t mean they need to exist. Man is the apex predator on this planet. Other animals exist only because we choose to let them.

I can agree with you that it is nice to have some other predators around. Generally someplace far away from people. But they are not at all necessary for anything.

And when it comes to having some other predators around, I am a total NIMBY. And I expect most people to feel the same way as I do. I am very happy to live where I don’t have to worry about predators eating my kids, cattle, dogs, chickens, etc. I think most people feel that way as well. I am not going to exterminate every last predator around me, but I choose to live in a neighborhood free of brown bears, wolves, and mountain lions. The black bears, coyotes, raccoons, and etc. can stick around as long as they don’t get too uppity.

So, given that, I am not going to ever support putting them in someone else’s backyard.
Might makes right huh? Just because we invented strychnine synthesis and conibears gives us the right to decide what species go extinct or not? Maybe you wouldn't exterminate "every last predator around" you. But the logical extension of your argument wouldn't preclude someone else from doing so.

I would not put my own desire for safety and game animals above my duty to be a good steward of all things that God, Providence, or random chance put on this planet. Some people seem to misinterpret that duty as being misanthropic, which couldn't be farther from the truth. I think very few people on this forum would fail to agree that spending time in the natural world is one of the greatest things a person can do for their wellbeing. So I think we should do our best to maintain that natural world in as complete a state as is reasonably possible. I think its highly arrogant as a species to pick and choose the parts that suit us and toss out the rest.

Call me a hypocrite for not getting rid of my indoor plumbing or shunning antibiotics if you want. Life is about compromises and we all have to pick where we draw our lines. But outside of my fence line I err towards letting nature be intact so that myself and many generations to come can have the opportunity to enjoy the magnificent beauty of the world in all its splendor.
 
No motive other than trying to figure out my stance. I've carried a wolf tag hunting the last 2 years and have gotten both agreement and guff from others that I've talked about it with (guff coming mostly from non-hunters). I don't really have enough info and don't feel like I've talked to enough people who i believe have info to have a strong stance myself, but if im going to carry a wolf tag/harvest one, I'd like to do so from a defensible position. Figured this wasn't a bad place to get input.
Its worth considering that many 'non-hunters' do not understand the way hunting in North America works even at a basic level. Plenty of them think we just wander around and blast anything with a pulse. I wouldn't put too much stock in their opinions. Wolves need to be managed like any other species if they are going to be around people. The debate around if wolves should be there or not is far above my pay grade. My stance is if they are there, we need a plan to manage them.
 
Back
Top