Montana vs. Idaho Spring Bear

[Sharpspur]

So I know there is a lot of hype on Idaho for spring bear, and it is probably well deserved. If you were choosing between Idaho and Montana, what are the pros and cons to each?

 

[CMcCormick1805]

I wouldn’t know where to start with Idaho.

I can say the pros of Montana are defined snow lines and varied landscape. I’ve now seen bears in sage and on mountain tops. There is minimal hunting pressure and opportunities to see other wildlife in places they will not be in general season.

The cons are long glassing days to see maybe 3 bears. Which could be error on my part. The weather depending on the year can change rapidly and leave you with 2 feet of snow in May.

 

[Team4LongGun]

I hunt both. I can find much more remote, less pressured areas in Idaho by a large margin. The downside is getting around-some of it is a long way in, and doesn't connect to the next area. Snow access is another. You have to time it right for sure.

 

[GoatPackr]

Hunt the one you can spend the most days hunting. They are both great and boots on the ground is going to make the most difference.

 

[Sharpspur]

Driving from WI so Montana will get us there quicker. Was looking at unit 28 in Idaho west of Salmon

 

[EdP]

Hunted a northeast Idaho unit in 2019. Mt was adjacent and the same terrain and weather. Some of those northern units in Idaho have "reduced" tags and you can get 2 for about $84 total. Don't know anything about Mt tags.

 

[GoatPackr]

Hunted a northeast Idaho unit in 2019. Mt was adjacent and the same terrain and weather. Some of those northern units in Idaho have "reduced" tags and you can get 2 for about $84 total. Don't know anything about Mt tags.

MT Non-resident is about $350 and you only get 1 tag.

 

[Soj51hopeful]

Idaho season opens 2 weeks earlier and you can bait if interested.
Montana is closer to you, but has a lot of G bears to keep in mind.