Montana corner crossing lawsuit.

You would be surprised the amount of people buying homes, land, ranches that never read a title report or even look at the assessors map of their property and assume whatever their real estate broker tells them is correct. I am constantly having to fight people on recorded easements and deeded right of way that people think they own just because the previous owners used it like they owned it.
 
I don’t blame the land brokers. No matter what they claim, it’s on the buyer to differentiate between the deeded acreage and state or BLM holdings. Only a fool would believe they’re outright buying public land.
You are totally missing my point. Everyone involved knows exactly what is going on.

The brokers "sell" the exclusive access to x number of acres of forest service land etc. They put it in their ads, in order to get a premium price. The buyers most certainly "buy" based on this exclusive border with public land. And they pay way more, than if the property borders private land.

This is why the land owner in Wy sued, and claimed his exclusive access was worth millions.
 
I've never understood why corner crossing only applies to situations that involve public/private corners. Would the same trespassing law apply if it was two private owners with two parcels each but only joined at a four corner point. Could one private owner prevent the other from crossing at the center? Why the distinction of public (owned by the taxpayers)? Are taxpayer owned lands subservient to private, sure seems like it.
 
Private corner crossing doesn’t exist. Landowners don’t care if a neighbor drives a 40-foot combine through their property to access public or private property. But if a hunter wants to access public land they feel is theirs, by God, everyone knows that brief intrusion in the corner airspace is criminal!
 
I've never understood why corner crossing only applies to situations that involve public/private corners. Would the same trespassing law apply if it was two private owners with two parcels each but only joined at a four corner point. Could one private owner prevent the other from crossing at the center? Why the distinction of public (owned by the taxpayers)? Are taxpayer owned lands subservient to private, sure seems like it.
There is a LOT of public/private land in the west that is checkerboard. So that precludes what you are talking about.

I haven't seen anywhere there is checkerboard where 2 people each own 2/4 squares.
But there are property line disputes between land owners outside of this.
 
Looks like MOGA was a major player in Gianfortes campaign and election. Chuck Rein, controls the access at the base of the Crazies, president of MOGA, was on the transition team. Two other MOGA board members were also in the transition team. MOGA members are all over the donation list, many making max contributions.

Sent from my moto g power - 2025 using Tapatalk
 
I've never understood why corner crossing only applies to situations that involve public/private corners. Would the same trespassing law apply if it was two private owners with two parcels each but only joined at a four corner point. Could one private owner prevent the other from crossing at the center? Why the distinction of public (owned by the taxpayers)? Are taxpayer owned lands subservient to private, sure seems like it.
That's what I don't get too.
Even if it's not an exact corner crossing, what happens when a private piece of land is locked up by other private pieces? Doesn't someone have to give up a right of way?
 
Back
Top