@mtwarden nicely done sir. The wide temp range on the ambient is no joke, so it’s not surprising to read you found the same. The origin surprises me a bit and shows the value of the review process you did. I’m also surprised on the moisture retention on the cirque light, but as you said, that’s almost a hybrid puffy/fleece where the others are straight mid-layers.
Having that contrast of construction approaches included really helps differentiate each one with testing you did. I agree with @Justin Crossley there isn’t a comparable review out there. Good on you guys for putting this together. The manufacturers that didn’t participate really missed out!
I’ve personally found the ambient has pretty well taken over from straight fleece for me. If I hadn’t gotten it on discount I probably wouldn’t be saying that though….
Awesome review @mtwarden very well done.
I was looking forward to the wet test as i had never heard of such a thing before. While not comfortable for you to do X4, it shows a lot. Kudos to you for toughing that out. Frost on the forearms does not sound fun.
As a point of reference, i have found my ambient hoody to he wind resistant to about 12-13 mph, under that i feel no bleed thru. I wonder if being soaked under makes that more noticeable. Don’t think i will try that tho, but we rarely have temps that low in Texas.
Well done sir!
Mlx mdwi hoody for me. Works great. 30d nylon is perfect
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well done, thanks! I especially enjoyed the moisture movement part. This also reinforces just how many really good alternatives we have. I’m going to have to try some similar test on my local mountain. See how my different options of gear perform. Also, we ought to be able to come up with a standard way to rate wind resistance. I find that can really expand the range of a piece.
A note on scoring. I noted that you did not tally the scores for a rating, which is good. This comment is aimed at other reviews that do sum the scores. It just came to my mind now and is for the RS bosses for future consideration. I work with real ops analysts evaluating systems, capabilities, and requirements. One thing the real math guys always stress is the need to separate a grade for performance from a grade of importance. In other words, an 8 for fit may not count the same as an 8 for warmth (example). Hunting in Oregon perhaps weighs water resistance higher than someone hunting in Arizona. For each person, and situation the weights can vary, but that allows a true scoring. If you have 100% score to dole out, what percentage do you give each element. Or put another way, how important is each criteria relative to the others. For our case, it would be valuable to see how experienced reviewers rate the importance of each category. Food for thought.
Hey mtwarden. Do you have experience with the Sitka heavyweight hoodie and/or the Fanatic hoodie? Wondering where they would fall in the mix with these other mid layers.
Great review,
I have an ambient jacket, really nice though the sleeves bunch up slightly at my wrist, not other Sitka pieces I own do this!
Looks like a First Lite Origin will be my first piece from them, I am a bowhunter and a full zip hoody sounds great!
Thank you for your response. Based on the number of responses and questions, you’re going to be a busy man for the foreseeable future. We all really appreciate it. Thanks. -RufusI have a Sitka Heavyweight. Similar fabric weight to the Origin, heavier than the Vigor (so warmer). It's a grid style vs the closed weave of the Origin. It's going to breathe better than the other jackets (save the Vigor)- not a lot for wind or precip protection. Going to be similar in quietness to the other fleeces. Moving moisture I'd guess similar to the other fleeces.
I still use mine if I'm going to be hunting thick timbered cover (which is fair bit of the time)- less worries about tearing anything and it's quiet.
The Origin is solid, but it's a half zip, not full