Just to clear a few things up here....
First, I just posted a thread about some of the new developments we have coming out this summer, including a the active insulation piece mentioned in this particular thread.
Second, when we are developing a new piece of gear, I am very selective about who I send prototypes for testing. And when I do sent something to a person for testing, it is for no other reason than to get their feedback on that particular prototype. If the person I sent gear for testing never provided any feedback at all, there is no recourse or action taken of any kind. They're not asked to ship it back, pay for it, etc.
Furthermore, when I send a prototype for testing, it is just a prototype, and it may not actually make it to the market.
When I make contact with someone for testing and feedback, I do not ask them if they are or are not a member of a forum, group, or other entity. Nor do I ask what their username is or affiliation is with Rokslide. Nor do I ask them to mention, share, or promote in any way the prototype that they are going to test.
So it seems like quite a stretch to say that a person that tested a prototype is in fact "developing and tweaking products" for OV or that OV "gave away a product to talk about on a forum."
Neither of those statements are true or even close to true. We did not ask anyone testing our prototypes to mention it, share it, promote it, or say anything about it on any forum or platform.
However, I do respect that a moderator should err on the side of watching out for Rokslide and doing what's best for their interests. In that spirit, I apologize for any confusion or misplaced blame to those that have spoken about our prototypes, and any disrespect or mishandling shown on our part. Lesson learned.