mws-pa
FNG
Im ok with them putting the brand on whatever they want as long as the show and podcast dont seem the change. Lets hope they stay consistent
I hear this same argument a lot, and I get why its being made to a degree. I am just wondering maybe its possible the Meateater crew and anyone else invloved that is pro all of those things thinks its better to partner with opposing views instead of run from them. Maybe they can influence the Chernin guy to rethink some of his ideas. Why would an anti 2A guy invest in a gun toting business, to burn it into the ground? Would you invest your money into a business model that you hated? I doubt it...Just a thoughtFirst of all I’m willing to admit when I’m wrong but from all the digging I’ve done on this whole meat eater sellout thing this is what I’ve found in overwhelming fashion. This Peter Chernin guy that bought controlling interest is a left winger, anti 2a, anti predator hunting, hollywood goon. I’d suggest for everyone to boycott first lite, meat eater and the whole thing. Why am I going to give my money to fund people that stand directly against things I hold dear. Rinella, the talking mustache, and their crew had to know all this, didn’t give a shit and sold out anyhow. I mean for god sakes Chernin donated a shit load of money to our current presidents campaign. That alone makes my stomach hurt. But people look past all that when rinella says that he’s pro 2a. If it were me I’d sink that company into the ground before letting scum into my business. I can do lots of different things to earn a living. Lots of options out there folks, no need to keep funding people that will turn around and use your money against you. That’s all I have
Im ok with them putting the brand on whatever they want as long as the show and podcast dont seem the change. Lets hope they stay consistent
never tried the podcasts for em, ive barely.delved into podcasts on anything, a couple of times for team roping I guess.Man, I've been having a really hard time lasting more than half an hour on podcasts recently... just can't get into them at all. Steve'e interrupting has become kind of an annoying shtick and the topics are well, tepid...
I completely agree. he's very logical, and ethical, and well versed, and a fantastic representative.I think Rinella is great for pro hunting, he is very well spoken and has great ethics. He isn't the bad ass backcountry guy but that's not what we need in the limelight with the non hunting world. I am glad he is out there.
This has made me rethink it a lot too. I really enjoy the content. But I can't get myself to buy first lite anymore. Shame too because their merino is amazing.First of all I’m willing to admit when I’m wrong but from all the digging I’ve done on this whole meat eater sellout thing this is what I’ve found in overwhelming fashion. This Peter Chernin guy that bought controlling interest is a left winger, anti 2a, anti predator hunting, hollywood goon. I’d suggest for everyone to boycott first lite, meat eater and the whole thing. Why am I going to give my money to fund people that stand directly against things I hold dear. Rinella, the talking mustache, and their crew had to know all this, didn’t give a shit and sold out anyhow. I mean for god sakes Chernin donated a shit load of money to our current presidents campaign. That alone makes my stomach hurt. But people look past all that when rinella says that he’s pro 2a. If it were me I’d sink that company into the ground before letting scum into my business. I can do lots of different things to earn a living. Lots of options out there folks, no need to keep funding people that will turn around and use your money against you. That’s all I have
why would Rinella have Charles post on 2 times and praise him. The same Charles post who made an anti gun video with the multi millionaire thom shoes owner calling for a ban on firearms? They both help shut down the WY and MT grizzly bear season too. those are just facts.I hear this same argument a lot, and I get why its being made to a degree. I am just wondering maybe its possible the Meateater crew and anyone else invloved that is pro all of those things thinks its better to partner with opposing views instead of run from them. Maybe they can influence the Chernin guy to rethink some of his ideas. Why would an anti 2A guy invest in a gun toting business, to burn it into the ground? Would you invest your money into a business model that you hated? I doubt it...Just a thought
lolI hear this same argument a lot, and I get why its being made to a degree. I am just wondering maybe its possible the Meateater crew and anyone else invloved that is pro all of those things thinks its better to partner with opposing views instead of run from them. Maybe they can influence the Chernin guy to rethink some of his ideas. Why would an anti 2A guy invest in a gun toting business, to burn it into the ground? Would you invest your money into a business model that you hated? I doubt it...Just a thought
I wouldn’t personally, I have morals though and can’t be bought. That guy sold his soul a long time ago and is clearly all about the bottom line of the dollar. I try not to rationalize things that pertain to the constitution. The facts are the facts and when you stand against things that are important to me I wouldn’t give a penny to you. Especially at such critical times.I hear this same argument a lot, and I get why its being made to a degree. I am just wondering maybe its possible the Meateater crew and anyone else invloved that is pro all of those things thinks its better to partner with opposing views instead of run from them. Maybe they can influence the Chernin guy to rethink some of his ideas. Why would an anti 2A guy invest in a gun toting business, to burn it into the ground? Would you invest your money into a business model that you hated? I doubt it...Just a thought
So you will continue to fund this company that in turn takes your money and shells it out to people that want to take away your rights? Which is a fact. Btw we don’t need him. I see it as a compromise that I’m not willing to make because he is in bed with the enemy. I would say we need him if he wasn’t involved with these scum bags. I see it more as he could be considered helpful at the moment but could bring real harm at a later date, which is not worth it. Especially at this crucial juncture that we are at currently. No disrespect to you as I seem to be on the extreme side of this issue and more people seem to be like you. I don’t understand it I guess.Love or hate him, we neeed him. He is a hunting voice with a large imprint in the world. Yes he ruined some spots, and he’s selling out, but unless he becomes a spokesperson for Cabelas/BPS, or pushing some BS supplement, im still wth him!
This is fake news. Rinella didn't have Charles post on. Ben O'Brien did on his podcast, hunting collective. One of his appearances on the show was I believe before MeatEater owned the hunting collective podcast. The second appearance happened before he made that anti gun video and Post hasent been back on since.why would Rinella have Charles post on 2 times and praise him. The same Charles post who made an anti gun video with the multi millionaire thom shoes owner calling for a ban on firearms? They both help shut down the WY and MT grizzly bear season too. those are just facts.
Rinella's doing it for the money
Ep. 20: Charles Post | MeatEater Podcasts
The great and all-knowing Charles Post returns for another podcast in episode No. 20. Charles was born and raised in northern California, earning a B.S. and M.S. in ecology from U.C. Berkeley, but nowadays he resides (and hunts) in Bozeman, Montana with his lovely fiancé Rachel Pohl. Charles and...www.themeateater.com