^^ so in this, you’re arguing for energy based on hydrostatic shock (a topic that’s controversial and highly-debated).
But here you’re equating energy with penetration:
And here you’re equating energy to damage to immediate vital organs:
It sounds like you’re just throwing stuff to see what will stick, since you’re ultimately using energy to argue three different things.
Btw, for what it’s worth, even your authors have suggested that hydrostatic shock, if it exists, should be far down the totem pole of how to choose a cartridge.