March- Why not?

Where did you see this?? I would like to know a little more if you could share.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Check out their Facebook. I’ll attach a photo. Capped windage. Lower profile elevation. Illumination on the ocular. 18% lighter. Video released yesterday. Not sure if it is on the site
 
How old was it? The first gen were NATO mil so lots of people thought they were off but they were made that way. They required a correction factor (.97) in the solver to correct for it. As I said earlier in the thread March changed that down the road.
Mine was off in the other direction - clicks were larger rather than smaller. If you look at that vid, it wasn’t bad. 1.5 tenths error over 10 mils at most? Maybe a 1.014 correction value rather than 0.97?
 
They also have two new reticles coming out designed around ffp hunting. One in mil and one in moa. They are supposed to be available mid April per what they said. I’ll find that link too. It should be right around 30oz which is good by me. I plan on putting one on my 300nmi being done around june
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2456.png
    IMG_2456.png
    397.7 KB · Views: 2
Check out their Facebook. I’ll attach a photo. Capped windage. Lower profile elevation. Illumination on the ocular. 18% lighter. Video released yesterday. Not sure if it is on the site
18% lighter than prior zco 420 -- and still 33% heavier than a March F. Just a totally different size class
 
Zco looks nice for dudes who want to spend $4k for a 29ish ounce hunt scope and have Alpha glass. I wouldn’t be surprised if the “rokscope” fits my needs just as well at 1/4 the price. TBD
 
Back
Top