philcox
WKR
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2018
- Location
- Auburn, CA
So, I have spent a couple years building up a couple rifles. Built then RH because I figured that I will be handing them down, and my son is RH. I shoot LH, so am THINKING about getting/building me a rifle. Here is my current "options" and why I am hesitating with each.
To start with I am just hesitating in general, since I have been shooting RH rifles all my life, and I have build 2 that are lights out. I ask myself "Do I really need a LH rifle?" I am still internally battling that decision, but this post is assuming I come up with "Yes! You can never have too many rifles"
General "wants" and "biases" starting out:
I'd be real curious as to a few thoughts on if for handload and hunting performance is the COAL or the Twist Rate more important?
Any thoughts on those (are others similar), is appreciated. The $4k is about the top (actually slightly above) of what I am willing to spend.
To start with I am just hesitating in general, since I have been shooting RH rifles all my life, and I have build 2 that are lights out. I ask myself "Do I really need a LH rifle?" I am still internally battling that decision, but this post is assuming I come up with "Yes! You can never have too many rifles"
General "wants" and "biases" starting out:
- 300WM because I already have all the handloading material I will need, and since I have been actively looking for primers for over 6 months, and they essentially seem to have become extinct, I went with 300WM
- 300WM because it is a tried and true cartridge that I can literally use for any game in NA
- I want to hand load to get max performance out of a load. I am in Cali, so need to load dev for non-lead projectiles
- I have legal access to a suppressor outside of CA, so will run it suppressed in those hunts
- I'd like gun that can reach out to 900y and that is sub-moa
- I backpack hunt, so want it reasonably light
- I want it to be LH
- My current 300WM meets all of that, but is RH
Option | Rough Cost | Pro | Con |
Build a semi-custom: Tikka action, Mesa Altitude Stock, CarbonSix 1:8 22" barrel, Ross Muzzle Break | $2700 | I have built one. It shoots .5 moa. it weighs 8.5# scoped and recoils like my 6.5CM. I get the 22" barrel that I can run suppressed, and I get the 1:8 twist rate for the longer projectiles | The COAL is limited to ~3.37 with OEM Mag & BM. I have to have all of this stuff built and assembled |
Same Tikka, but with RedSnake BM and AICS Mag | $3000 | More COAL ability to 3.50 | Still limited to 3.50, and my Hammer Hunter was 3.570. Same "build" issues |
Christensen Arms Mesa FFT, replace stock with MPA Altitude or another | $2550 | Sub-MOA guarantee. No build needed, just a stock swap. 5.5# stock. COAL of ~3.70 | 1:10 twist means I can't use some of the newer projectiles. Not a CF barrel. |
APR Altitude 300 Win Mag: Defiance anTi, Proof barrel 1:9, AG Composite Adjustable Hunter, 7lb 6oz. Trigger Tech Trigger (1-3#) | $4000 | 1:9, 7lb 6oz. It is available. COAL 3.85. It's built. | $$$ compared to others. I also no nothing about the company and their guns, but the components are top notch. 24" barrel is longer than I want. |
I'd be real curious as to a few thoughts on if for handload and hunting performance is the COAL or the Twist Rate more important?
Any thoughts on those (are others similar), is appreciated. The $4k is about the top (actually slightly above) of what I am willing to spend.