I think its a fair point. Tons of public has concentrated access points. 30k acres, damn right I am parking and hiking in along the main routes, regardless of whether someone else is there. Even if someone did know where you were, no one gets to claim everything past where you happen to be either. If its early, I expect everyone to get there early enough so they arent blowing out my hunt right after legal light, but otherwise its public so I expect people to maybe walk by, and just ask them to give a reasonable amount of room when I whistle or flash a light at them. I work real hard to find places that most people either physically cant, or wont get to just for this reason. On a much smaller parcel like is common in many areas, yeah, be realistic—if theres a truck there, move on. But its gotta be a real small chunk of land for that to be legit imo.
At the same time there’s also the guy who walks up and sees you sitting there obviously hunting a specific area, and decides to sit down right in front of you blocking your ability to hunt, or close enough that you now need to move due to their presence. This is the same as when Im in my boat positioned 60’ from shore, actively casting to the bank, and someone paddling a canoe or kayak along the shore and can see me for hundreds of yards ahead of time, decides they are better off padding between me and the shore…rather than taking the 2 extra paddle strokes to go around. But at least they dont park there. It’s usually sheer ignorance, but boy is it annoying and incredibly assholeish. This is NOT the same as telling that guy he cant use the same trailhead on a big chunk of public.
Its not really on topic with regard to private property boundaries, but seems clear enough.