flyfisher117
WKR
Just took a multitool to it. Didnt look pretty but works
Roughly how much needs to be removed? It seems like it’s very close
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just took a multitool to it. Didnt look pretty but works
Would you say if using a bravo it would have been significantly better than the echo?Triggercam through identical T3x’s with SWFA 10x. 308 win, 147gr FMJ, UM OTB suppressors. First with KRG Echo, second with ROKStok.
The KRG is with doing everything possible to control recoil- everything. The ROKStok was held loose as possible for the first shot, and held normally for the second.
KRG Echo:
The first shot from was not spotted, reticle was 4 mils high and 5 mils right. Second was barely spotted, 7 mils high, 4 mils right.
ROKStok:
First shot was held loose, shot slotted easily, reticle was 1 mil down, and right 4 mils.
Second shot held normally, shot slotted, reticle never left target, down 2 mils.
There were also two Roksliders shooting both rifles that will hopefully comment on the difference. The short version is all thought the Echo was “violent” in recoil, and definitely was harder to spot shots.
Would you say if using a bravo it would have been significantly better than the echo?
According to the specs, there’s a 7.2 ounce delta between the Echo and the Bravo. Echo listed as 2.65 lbs (or 42.4 ounces), Bravo listed as 3.1 lbs (or 49.6 ounces).No. Using that, it is now at the weight of a Bravo. One can modify nearly any stock to work if weight doesn’t matter.
According to the specs, there’s a 7.2 ounce delta between the Echo and the Bravo. Echo listed as 2.65 lbs (or 42.4 ounces), Bravo listed as 3.1 lbs (or 49.6 ounces).
I was just trying to get clarification on a comment you made about the user who did a negative comb wrap on his Echo. You had commented that that would make it the weight of a Bravo, and I was confused. I thought maybe listed weights weren’t accurate or something.Yes?
I was just trying to get clarification on a comment you made about the user who did a negative comb wrap on his Echo. You had commented that that would make it the weight of a Bravo, and I was confused. I thought maybe listed weights weren’t accurate or something.
My bad. I thought he did a diy “tooless” method with foam or the cheek riser, and some wrap. I didn’t realize he installed the kit from KRG. My misunderstanding.The user I quoted was asking about the tool-less butt pad hight mechanism. Using that in the Echo brings it nearly to the weight of a Bravo.
My bad. I thought he did a diy “tooless” method with foam or the cheek riser, and some wrap. I didn’t realize he installed the kit from KRG. My misunderstanding.
There was two of us confused for a bit!No problem, I was just confused.
What stock? The echo has too much flex?I liked the stock but too much flex on the forend.
Yes, at least for me. I had a sendero carbon fiber barrel on it.What stock? The echo has too much flex?
Is it any different than the bravo in that sense?Yes, at least for me. I had a sendero carbon fiber barrel on it.
I have never owned a Bravo so I can’t compare them.Is it any different than the bravo in that sense?
Night and day. The bravo is perfectly stiff and far more damp to shoot.Is it any different than the bravo in that sense?