KRG Echo - Sporterish version of bravo for tikkas

Triggercam through identical T3x’s with SWFA 10x. 308 win, 147gr FMJ, UM OTB suppressors. First with KRG Echo, second with ROKStok.


The KRG is with doing everything possible to control recoil- everything. The ROKStok was held loose as possible for the first shot, and held normally for the second.


KRG Echo:
The first shot from was not spotted, reticle was 4 mils high and 5 mils right. Second was barely spotted, 7 mils high, 4 mils right.


ROKStok:
First shot was held loose, shot slotted easily, reticle was 1 mil down, and right 4 mils.
Second shot held normally, shot slotted, reticle never left target, down 2 mils.

There were also two Roksliders shooting both rifles that will hopefully comment on the difference. The short version is all thought the Echo was “violent” in recoil, and definitely was harder to spot shots.


 
Triggercam through identical T3x’s with SWFA 10x. First with KRG Echo, second with ROKStok.


The KRG is with doing everything possible to control recoil- everything. The ROKStok was held loose as possible for the first shot, and held normally for the second.


KRG Echo:
The first shot from was not spotted, reticle was 4 mils high and 5 mils right. Second was barely spotted, 7 mils high, 4 mils right.


ROKStok:
First shot was held loose, shot slotted easily, reticle was 1 mil down, and right 4 mils.
Second shot held normally, shot slotted, reticle never left target, down 2 mils.

There were also two Roksliders shooting both rifles that will hopefully comment on the difference. The short version is all thought the Echo was “violent” in recoil, and definitely was harder to spot shots.


What positions are you shooting in? What cartridge? What suppressor or muzzle device?
 
Yes, but there is no comparison between them in muzzle jump and spotting your own shots.
This was a substantial result. I appreciate the methodology for the comparison.

As a guy with an echo, I don't appreciate it as much, but objectively, tough to argue with the result.
 
This was a substantial result. I appreciate the methodology for the comparison.

As a guy with an echo, I don't appreciate it as much, but objectively, tough to argue with the result.

The Echo wouldn’t be bad if I could figure out what is making it rattle when it’s shot.
 
The Echo wouldn’t be bad if I could figure out what is making it rattle when it’s shot.
I jbwelded the aluminum backbone to the polymer portion of the stock. Mostly underneath the tikka recoil lug. Use it for my 223 and it sounds/shoots satisfactory.
 
I got an Echo in Tikka 16” 223 with a can . I like it no issues. But that’s practically no recoil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Triggercam through identical T3x’s with SWFA 10x. 308 win, 147gr FMJ, UM OTB suppressors. First with KRG Echo, second with ROKStok.


The KRG is with doing everything possible to control recoil- everything. The ROKStok was held loose as possible for the first shot, and held normally for the second.


KRG Echo:
The first shot from was not spotted, reticle was 4 mils high and 5 mils right. Second was barely spotted, 7 mils high, 4 mils right.


ROKStok:
First shot was held loose, shot slotted easily, reticle was 1 mil down, and right 4 mils.
Second shot held normally, shot slotted, reticle never left target, down 2 mils.

There were also two Roksliders shooting both rifles that will hopefully comment on the difference. The short version is all thought the Echo was “violent” in recoil, and definitely was harder to spot shots.


How much worse yet is the factory stock than the echo?
 
Triggercam through identical T3x’s with SWFA 10x. 308 win, 147gr FMJ, UM OTB suppressors. First with KRG Echo, second with ROKStok.


The KRG is with doing everything possible to control recoil- everything. The ROKStok was held loose as possible for the first shot, and held normally for the second.


KRG Echo:
The first shot from was not spotted, reticle was 4 mils high and 5 mils right. Second was barely spotted, 7 mils high, 4 mils right.


ROKStok:
First shot was held loose, shot slotted easily, reticle was 1 mil down, and right 4 mils.
Second shot held normally, shot slotted, reticle never left target, down 2 mils.

There were also two Roksliders shooting both rifles that will hopefully comment on the difference. The short version is all thought the Echo was “violent” in recoil, and definitely was harder to spot shots.


That's pretty crazy muzzle flip for the echo. I feel like the reticle movement looks eerily similar to shooting a 6.5 cm in a factory tikka stock.
 
Back
Top