I think I read that he's also married to a local judge.
Speaking of Rittenhouse, wasn't he found not guilty because folks chased him? In other words, they brought the fight to him and were the aggressors.
The video of this porch incident I watched show a guy leave a situation, go inside a safer place, retrieve a firearm, remove himself from a safe place by exiting through a barrier (door), and menacing a person who was no physical threat with the firearm.
All of that adds up to me seeing the shooter as the aggressor in the situation, and the victim confronting the shooter just like glorious Rittenhouse did. Unlike Rittenhouse, this victim of aggressive action ended up losing. The shooter doesn't have a leg to stand on, and should see a first degree, or whatever premeditated murder is in TX, and it is my personal opinion that responsible gunowners should champion that action.
Two points:
You might have watched an edited video.
He "menaced" a guy who was on his porch and refused to leave despite being told repeatedly to do so. In Texas.
Damn. From the first angle in that link, the shooters girlfriend was down range!
Watch the .25 mark when she starts backing up and BF heads into the house for the gun. I'd bet this entire scenario is a setup. The more you watch it the more obvious it becomes.Damn. From the first angle in that link, the shooters girlfriend was down range!
Unfortunately dudes haven't learned that no piece of azz is worth dying or killing for.Since the dawn of time, husbands have been killing boyfriends and boyfriends have been killing husbands because a wife decided to lay on her back and spread her legs for another.
Thanks for this, I agree with the analysis. Much more knowledgeable and thorough than my comment.
Totally, like they had the expectation and had comfortably come to terms that this would be the result. No surprise at all.I dunno if I've ever seen a group of people react less to someone getting smoked then these people.
Sent from my SM-S506DL using Tapatalk