Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(1) Unless otherwise provided by commission rule, it is unlawful for any person to hunt or take elk, deer, pronghorn, moose, or black bear with any firearm unless the person is wearing fluorescent pink or daylight fluorescent orange garments that meet the following requirements:
(a) Garments are solid fluorescent pink or daylight fluorescent orange colored material and are of sufficient brightness to be seen conspicuously from a reasonable distance.
(b) Garments shall be a minimum of five hundred square inches and shall be worn as an outer garment above the waist, part of which shall be a hat or head covering visible from all directions.
(2) Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of fifty dollars and an assessment of five license suspension points.
Colorado Revised Statutes Title 33. Parks and Wildlife SS 33-6-121 | FindLaw
Looking at the pics of it online it would be fine. It looks like any other blaze orange vest.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looking at the pics of it online it would be fine. It looks like any other blaze orange vest.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree. If the Springer doesn’t qualify, there are a ton of vests that don’t....
I can't think of a orange something made by an outdoor company that wouldn't work. I think it is meant to avoid matte orange brown such as Cleveland Browns orange.That is what spurred my question, what do they consider "sufficient brightness"? It is vague enough to cause concern.