Idaho NR general tag going to draw?

sasquatch

WKR
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
975
If there ever comes a time for points I hope it’s at least like Montana where you can’t build points forever

It’s [emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]] years then a restart. Get off the pot or s***


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

OSU

FNG
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Messages
17
Location
ID
Points systems are not going anywhere. They may change how they are used but the system is here to stay in any state that has one currently.
Every state that has made a change to the point system has put a larger percentage of tags in the random pool and less tags allocated to those with the most points....
 

wapitibob

WKR
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
6,149
Location
Bend Oregon
Every state that has made a change to the point system has put a larger percentage of tags in the random pool and less tags allocated to those with the most points....

Like WY going from 75/25 to 90/10 for S/M ?

OR went from 3% to 5% for limited entry NR random, then moved all the core area unlimited OTC archery Elk units to a draw, which cut the unlimited NR quota down to 5%.
 
Last edited:

CorbLand

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
8,346
Every state that has made a change to the point system has put a larger percentage of tags in the random pool and less tags allocated to those with the most points....
Your point? If you gain a point when you don’t draw that is a point system. Doesn’t change it based on how tags are allocated within the system.

States that have point systems are not trying to get rid of them. They are making changes within the point systems they currently have.
 

IdahoBeav

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
993
Your point? If you gain a point when you don’t draw that is a point system. Doesn’t change it based on how tags are allocated within the system.
It kinda does. The points/lottery split is like a potentiometer. A 90/10 system is much more on the points side than a 75/25 is.
 

OSU

FNG
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Messages
17
Location
ID
OR went from 3% to 5% for limited entry NR random, then moved all the core area unlimited OTC archery Elk units to a draw, which cut the unlimited NR quota down to 5%.
And this was done to burn points and has caused many people to cash in their points so they could get to hunt units that were previously OTC. And in Wyoming the fish and game wanted to go to a bonus point system......
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 3, 2021
Messages
379
Not a state that I interact with people that hunt as much as Idaho. There are plenty of people I have spoken with that are residents of Idaho and although less so, nonresidents that have said they wish Idaho would go to a point system.

Like I said, I hope I am wrong but I do believe that many think the draw will fix the problem and once it is realized it won’t, there will be other solution’s and the forefront of those will be some form of point systems. Not saying it will be tomorrow, next year or in ten but I will bet I see it in my lifetime.

I hope I am wrong.
You have to remember, here on Rokslide we are the minority when it comes to our understanding of other states systems compared to the average hunter. The average hunter doesn’t understand the details many here do. They think that other states point systems are working and they view them as the solution to not drawing.
Honestly if the otc opportunities stay the same, I dont care if controlled hunts go to a points system. Most of those hunts are overrated and are a privateland/outfitter game.
Personally, I wish they just did away with the controlled hunts all together and made it all otc and put in quotas where they deemed necessary. Especially with deer. From a genetic perspective, the general units have better trophy potential than the controlled units so why did we decide to make them the trophy hunts?
Hijacked
 

WRO

WKR
Joined
Nov 6, 2013
Messages
3,573
Location
Idaho
Honestly if the otc opportunities stay the same, I dont care if controlled hunts go to a points system. Most of those hunts are overrated and are a privateland/outfitter game.
Personally, I wish they just did away with the controlled hunts all together and made it all otc and put in quotas where they deemed necessary. Especially with deer. From a genetic perspective, the general units have better trophy potential than the controlled units so why did we decide to make them the trophy hunts?
Hijacked

Tell us you haven’t drawn a good tag without telling us..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

wapitibob

WKR
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
6,149
Location
Bend Oregon
And this was done to burn points and has caused many people to cash in their points so they could get to hunt units that were previously OTC. And in Wyoming the fish and game wanted to go to a bonus point system......

That's some next level, no idea wtf I'm talking about, but I'm gonna post it anyway, nonsense. The reason for the core archery units going to a draw was well documented, as was the WY task force and their meetings, which by the way, isn't the "WY fish and game".
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 3, 2021
Messages
379
Tell us you haven’t drawn a good tag without telling us..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
theres this religion here in Idaho for residents that believe theres actually bigger deer in otc units than in controlled units. Its called Robby Denning. Ignorance is bliss
 

IdahoBeav

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
993
The % of in-person sales jumped drastically from '23 to '24, and the number of transactions (number of hunters), items sold, and devices online dropped.
The current system is causing people to lose interest in Idaho. However, the tags are still easily selling out. A draw will make the number of participants go through the roof, and your chances of getting a tag will go way down.

The current system really is the best option.

1738192813384.png
 

LFC911

WKR
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
658
Location
Lenexa, KS
The % of in-person sales jumped drastically from '23 to '24, and the number of transactions (number of hunters), items sold, and devices online dropped.
The current system is causing people to lose interest in Idaho. However, the tags are still easily selling out. A draw will make the number of participants go through the roof, and your chances of getting a tag will go way down.

The current system really is the best option.

View attachment 830961
I wonder why revenue is down $2.5M in 2024/25 vs 2023/24. Did they cut NR tags or give more to R's? Maybe it's down because we haven't had any secondary or turned back tag sales?!?
 

IdahoBeav

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
993
I wonder why revenue is down $2.5M in 2024 vs 2023. Did they cut NR tags or give more to R's? Maybe it's down because we haven't had any secondary or turned back tag sales?!?
There were more hunting licenses sold in '23. More of the sales were online, and a lot of those people were only getting a tag for a single species.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
514
Location
Idaho
There were more hunting licenses sold in '23. More of the sales were online, and a lot of those people were only getting a tag for a single species.

I wonder how many NR are buying both deer and elk tags. In theory, we could have as few as 15,500 NR hunters every year if they all got deer tags and the same hunters also bought up the 12,800 elk tags. Or there could be as many as 28,300 NR hunters if they each only buy one tag. So in any given year the actual number of NR hunters is between 15,500 and 28,300.

With that in mind I wonder if the current system results in fewer NR hunters overall and if a draw system will result in more.
 

IdahoBeav

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
993
I wonder how many NR are buying both deer and elk tags. In theory, we could have as few as 15,500 NR hunters every year if they all got deer tags and the same hunters also bought up the 12,800 elk tags. Or there could be as many as 28,300 NR hunters if they each only buy one tag. So in any given year the actual number of NR hunters is between 15,500 and 28,300.

With that in mind I wonder if the current system results in fewer NR hunters overall and if a draw system will result in more.
I wonder how there were more than 28,300 transactions each year '21-'23. Maybe a lot people bought a license only- planning to hit a returned tag sale later, apply for controlled hunts, hunt for wolf/bear/cougar/birds/etc.?
 

farmermail

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 24, 2018
Messages
175
Location
Southwest ID
The % of in-person sales jumped drastically from '23 to '24, and the number of transactions (number of hunters), items sold, and devices online dropped.
The current system is causing people to lose interest in Idaho. However, the tags are still easily selling out. A draw will make the number of participants go through the roof, and your chances of getting a tag will go way down.

The current system really is the best option.

View attachment 830961
Agreed. Draw systems, random or points, make things equal and minimize effort. Current system: more effort, you get a tag. Yup, for those stuck to just online, not as "fair" as those who put in effort to fly out or get a buddy to stand in line. Such is life. I prefer systems where effort can yield results vs. everyone gets the same chance. If tags are selling out, why change? Maybe alter, like some capped zones, where 1/2 are sold in person, 1/2 online. Don't go to a draw.
 

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
6,626
Location
WA
The % of in-person sales jumped drastically from '23 to '24, and the number of transactions (number of hunters), items sold, and devices online dropped.
The current system is causing people to lose interest in Idaho. However, the tags are still easily selling out. A draw will make the number of participants go through the roof, and your chances of getting a tag will go way down.

The current system really is the best option.

View attachment 830961
That's 12k people who came to Idaho and spent money on one day. Some flew, all drove and most bought food and fuel. That's an economic win vs internet sales.
 

sasquatch

WKR
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
975
The % of in-person sales jumped drastically from '23 to '24, and the number of transactions (number of hunters), items sold, and devices online dropped.
The current system is causing people to lose interest in Idaho. However, the tags are still easily selling out. A draw will make the number of participants go through the roof, and your chances of getting a tag will go way down.

The current system really is the best option.

View attachment 830961



Not necessarily. Unless you can show how many people logged in for the sale on several computers you can’t compare the odds of getting a low number in line

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Top