Possibly, all I can do though is each time I am sent a survey I make sure to say that points system is an absolute non starter.Just wait. You got to give it a few years of people thinking and then realizing that taking it to a draw didn’t help. Then they will start to push for point systems.
If I am not mistaken, Idaho sets aside tags for outfitters. So in the example above there is 40 NR tags in a given unit, outfitters get a stake in those, lets say 4 tags. That leaves 36 for NR to apply for. You can call it preference I suppose but its set from the start, before the draw.I'm assuming the outfitter gets preference over NR's?!? Are the NR's that put in for that unit drawing dead if the outfitter is applying for the same unit? Just curious.
That is correct. If you look through the previous allocations, there are a few zones that exceed that 10 percent now .If I am not mistaken, Idaho sets aside tags for outfitters. So in the example above there is 40 NR tags in a given unit, outfitters get a stake in those, lets say 4 tags. That leaves 36 for NR to apply for. You can call it preference I suppose but its set from the start, before the draw.
Wyoming erases points if you don't apply every year?Especially systems like Wyoming that erase your points if your not a loyal client.
Wyoming erases points if you don't apply every year?
Yes I like this more fair for folks who can’t get a resident in line and reducing to 10% is also good. Unfortunately the next will be to put more caps on resident hunters as we are also a big part of overcrowding with the never ending surge of people moving to the once great Gem stateThanks. As a CO resident I bet Idaho folks are pumped about that. Glad Idaho is taking care of their own.
There shouldn’t be an NR tags for once in a lifetime species for NR in my opinionAll limited control hunts (all species) should be resident only. Increase the general non resident tags a small % to make up the budget difference or increase the resident limited control tag cost to make up the difference. Especially the big three (moose, sheep & goat) should be resident only.
Definitely agree, the process now isn't workingas a non resident I like it. The online process doesnt work right now. Its BS that if you know a local they can go into a shop and "cut the line".
I agree with @CorbLand . There are going to be folks that may never draw, that were able to buy a tag in years past. Sorry @Ross, I know you were a big fan of the way it is now. It will be interesting to see if purchasing a license in order to put in for the draw will be required. My guess is it will and that might sour people on trying at all.Just wait. You got to give it a few years of people thinking and then realizing that taking it to a draw didn’t help. Then they will start to push for point systems.
I think the main gripe is that currently, there are ways to get more opportunities to purchase a tag on the day tags go on sale. In person sales, where store owners are charging for places in line. Flying in to Idaho and buying 10 tags for you and friends, logging in to the system on multiple devices, etc. There probably more. So they are trying to at least make it a more level playing field.I don't see how zone/unit specific draw for these tags is going to fix anything... At least the way it is now you can see what's still available when your turn comes and select accordingly. Some simple revisions to the current system would have been sufficient. Like... allow groups to purchase tags together, prevent tag mule purchasing, etc.
Kinda my point. With a few tweaks to the current system, these "loopholes" could be closed to create a more level playing field without going to a draw.I think the main gripe is that currently, there are ways to get more opportunities to purchase a tag on the day tags go on sale. In person sales, where store owners are charging for places in line. Flying in to Idaho and buying 10 tags for you and friends, logging in to the system on multiple devices, etc. There probably more. So they are trying to at least make it a more level playing field.