Hypothetical but kinda not.

robtattoo

WKR
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
3,499
Location
Tullahoma, TN
Which of these would you take for elk? 500yds is my absolute limit & this will be the 'hunt of a lifetime'. Well, it won't, but let's say it was for the sake of arguing 😁

Rifle 1:
Screenshot_20230310_201453_Shooter.jpg

Or, rifle 2:
Screenshot_20230310_201534_Shooter.jpg
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
1,186
Location
Michigan
im a partition fan so i want to say rifle #1 but for once in a lifetime i will say rifle #2. There is a chance that your animal is farther than 500 yards and rifle #1 is running low on velocity.
 
OP
robtattoo

robtattoo

WKR
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
3,499
Location
Tullahoma, TN
im a partition fan so i want to say rifle #1 but for once in a lifetime i will say rifle #2. There is a chance that your animal is farther than 500 yards and rifle #1 is running low on velocity.
If it's beyond 500yds, I wouldn't take the shot. That's is my absolute accuracy limit with better than 80% first-hit confidence, assuming a 10" target in any wind. Any further & I'd pass.
 

Taudisio

WKR
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Messages
997
Location
Oregon
They're a possibility for No.1, but not as accurate as the Partitions. They don't shoot at all well in No.2
That is most unfortunate. Either way you should be good. I’d take the rifle I am more comfortable with or one with sentimental value. I would keep the gameking off the shoulder, but I have no experience with it on game. So it may be just fine.
 

kharb22

WKR
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
321
Location
Utah
I'd lean towards #2. Less drop at 500 and carries more energy.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk
 

mxgust

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 12, 2020
Messages
191
Location
Wyoming
Whichever one you feel, but I might lean to the one shooting the heavier bullet
 
Top