spike camp
WKR
And then triple that amount of videos, with idiot civilian hunter videos.You could fill this forum with similar videos.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And then triple that amount of videos, with idiot civilian hunter videos.You could fill this forum with similar videos.
The real point of LE vs Non-LE is why pay government to do something citizens would pay to do?
Obviously you can't have hunters running around the more touristy areas, but managed properly by the NPS I think this could be a great thing and I like seeing the pressure of an order to try to make it happen more. I also like the more normalization of hunting, if park visitors see signs indicating certain areas are open to hunters and such it helps to keep hunting normalized in the eyes of Joe Schmoe public. In the end more available public property to hunt is always a good thing.
Hunters interact with non hunters on national forest and BLM land all the time.We were in Yellowstone the middle of September last year.Obviously you can't have hunters running around the more touristy areas,
If approved it might offset federal lands sold off for private development.
But somehow the speeches will make it sound like a positive![]()
It gotten brought up multiple times as solutions to budget problems. Or "less utilized" public lands being used for housing. Or states taking control of federal lands.
Overall anytime a politician claims to be helping us in a speech they are working on screwing us another way.
I think some of the idea for this is so politicians can tell the hunting community "hey we got X amount of additional acres for you to hunt, now let's talk about the other federal lands we proposed a while back". I think it's a work around to take the heat off the public land they wanted to try and sell but the outdoor community came out and voiced their opinions, which got it shut down. And as we know, even if they open it up to hunting, it will be very restricted on when, where and how.In the end more available public property to hunt is always a good thing.
I've watched a Sheriff's Deputy miss an injured whitetail twice at 10 yards with his (red dot equipped) 9mm. Then went back to the cruiser, came back with a shotgun, and put a load of #11 bird shot in its ass and backstraps. I had to put a 147gr XTP into it's head after he left the scene.
LEOs would be my last choice for culling deer in sensitive areas. I know there's a lot of exemptions, but they're typically some of the worst shooters I see at the range.
Good pointRemoval of the liability factor.
Same here. Witnessed a group of LEOs at a local range (before they had their own where they could hide) and most of them could not hit paper at 25 yards. Our finest.Ya. I watched a class of LEO qualifying after a bit of training at an indoor range. No idea who they were, obviously not street cops. Probably staff that barely needs a gun, but all LEO.
It was pretty rough.![]()
Seems like they would still meet the requirement. It's not just NP where animals get habituated to people. You'd have to start looking at suburban whitetails, animals in high rec areas, etc.Would these animals meet the requirements for fair chase for B&C and P&Y? Seems at least the first year most of those animals would have no sense of fear for humans which would give an unfair advantage to the hunter. No fence keeping them in there though so they are free ranging and wild?
OkayGood point
When a LEO injures someone they aren personally liable.
This may be part of what the “other hand” is up to:It gotten brought up multiple times as solutions to budget problems. Or "less utilized" public lands being used for housing. Or states taking control of federal lands.
Overall anytime a politician claims to be helping us in a speech they are working on screwing us another way.
Everything I’ve read makes this sound like they’re just loosening up restrictions on places that already allow hunting, generally to either align with state laws, or because the thing they banned is already outlawed in the state so it’s a redundant law. If I remember right there was a similar push in Trump’s first term to do the same thing and open up more USFW land to hunting and fishing.hunting season in the Cape Cod National Seashore in Massachusetts, for example, would be extended through the spring and summer. Hunters in the Lake Meredith National Recreation Area in Texas would be allowed to clean their kills in bathrooms. And hunters would be allowed to kill alligators in the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve in Louisiana
Obviously you can't have hunters running around the more touristy areas, but managed properly by the NPS I think this could be a great thing and I like seeing the pressure of an order to try to make it happen more. I also like the more normalization of hunting, if park visitors see signs indicating certain areas are open to hunters and such it helps to keep hunting normalized in the eyes of Joe Schmoe public. In the end more available public property to hunt is always a good thing.