Thanks JordanI don’t want to speak for Robby but here’s an article he did on the scope subject.
https://www.rokslide.com/hash-marks-or-turrets-a-mule-deer-hunter-s-perspective/
We were glassing as we went along with eyes looking. Looking first.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, @Fatcamp I'm still running capped turrets (per the article @Jordan Budd posted.)
I haven't seen the need yet to dial for the way I hunt, but Fuzzy might change my mind some day. That scope is the @Vortex Optics Light Hunter 2-10x40 with the hash mark system. I reviewed it here:
Vortex Razor HD Light Hunter 2-10x40 Riflescope Review
Vortex Razor HD Light Hunter 2-10×40 Riflescope Review By Robby Denning, Rokslide Editor Vortex released their HD Light Hunter (LH) riflescope line in 2016. Marrying their top glass from the Razor lines with a lightweight simple scope design, they’ve answered the call of the backcountry hunter...
www.rokslide.com
On that 270 WSM, I can get to about 690 with the last hash mark. I've never killed a buck over about 460 yards (or even shot at one) so with my current set-up, it's doing all I need. There was one Colorado buck in 1996 that I could have killed had a good hash mark system existed for the working-stiff back then, but he too was around 450. Since then (23 years), I've always tried and been able to get closer.
For still-hunting, it depends on how much cover I'm in. If visibility is less than about 75 yards, the human eye is great, but if I'm in broken cover with more visibility, then I'm using the binos more. Seems like my eyes pick them up before my binos but you do need both.
Thanks for watching man