Cody finch
FNG
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2020
- Messages
- 32
Thank you for the mag length. The stock is carbon fiber isn't it?
Thank you for the mag length. The stock is carbon fiber isn't it?
100 and it's worse than just that 2 stage trigger, it's too far back, too curved, the face of it feels cheaper than gas station cap gunsI would be all in if it weren't for that 2-stage trigger. I hate them. I have never understood how adding reliable creep to a trigger became a good thing.
I ordered one of these in .308 , it has not shown up yet . After reading this thread , I called and spoke with the senior VP of marketing and sales for Howa. He assured me that the stocks are Stocky's carbon fiber with Accublock bedding block . I also called Talley and asked about light weight rings and although they are not in stock now, he said to keep an eye out as they are working on them and expect them to be in stock in 8-12 weeks . Howa is also working on traditional mounts for the gun , but they have no projected release date on them as of yet .
I ordered a superlite . I have not received it yet . I am in no way doubting you analysis of your stock , just relaying info that was told to me by Howa . I also saw a full page Howa add in this months Rifle magazine that says big as day that the gun has a the Stocky's carbon fibor stock with bedding block , so it is curious to me what is going on . Maybe it is just a real flimsy poorly made carbon fiber stock ?
I hear what you’re saying about this gun, and I agree the advertising wasn’t clear. And if the VP of sales is passing misinformation on their products, that’s disconcerting. But despite that, I would shoot the gun before I made any decisions. My Tikka is not significantly handicapped by a plastic stock, floor plate, magazine, and trigger guard. While the Tikka is not $1300 gun, making a sub-5 pound gun will take some outside the box thinking and materials.I am always open to the possibility I am an absolute idiot and just can’t recognize the carbon fiber, but it feels just like any plastic stock I have ever used. When I called howa I just asked the first guy that answered the phone and he confirmed it was a plastic stock on the superlite. I have noticed that howa never says it is a carbon fiber stock in any of their advertisements, which would be shocking if it was, because that would be a major selling point. The one magazine article you referenced is the only place online I can find anybody saying it’s carbon fiber.
As far as bedding blocks, even if it did have one, it not very useful since the trigger guard/magazine well is plastic. You can’t put much torque on the action screws without breaking that plastic.
I hear what you’re saying about this gun, and I agree the advertising wasn’t clear. And if the VP of sales is passing misinformation on their products, that’s disconcerting. But despite that, I would shoot the gun before I made any decisions. My Tikka is not significantly handicapped by a plastic stock, floor plate, magazine, and trigger guard. While the Tikka is not $1300 gun, making a sub-5 pound gun will take some outside the box thinking and materials.
we appreciate the feedback, thank you for posting that with little info (especially firsthand) aroundI just bought one of these in 6.5 creedmoor. If any of you have any questions let me know and I’ll do my best to answer them.
A few things off the top. My 6.5cm weighed in at 4lbs 13oz. I assume the 308 version would be a little lighter since it’s got a bigger hole in the barrel but still a little disappointing that it was 6oz off the listed weight when the primary selling point of the rifle is weight. Nowhere does it say the 6.5cm weighs more than the 308 in the howa advertisements.
To be brutally honest I was a little disappointed with the rifle upon initial inspection. I incorrectly assumed the stock would be painted carbon fiber, but it is just an extremely cheap feeling plastic. The barrel was not free floated with the stock touching the barrel in multiple places and the barrel was slightly off center of the barrel channel. The stock is very lacking in rigidity and even slight pressure on the forend causes barrel contact even after I sanded out the channel to get the barrel free floated. The bottom “metal” is all plastic that feels very breakable. It has no pillars or any sort of reinforcement for the action screws.
One other downside I ran into is the scope rail it comes with it unnecessarily tall. Even with low rings it holds my 3.5-10x40 Leupold WAY too high. I was going to need to add a cheek riser to get a good cheek weld on the stock if I used the factory picatinny scope mount. No scope mount manufaturer that I was able to find makes any other mounts for it. I ended up buying a set of Talley lightweight low mounts for a regular 1500 and modifying the rear mount by cutting it shorter and milling a new screw hole due to the smaller .500” rear screw spacing on this modified action.
With my modified low 30mm Talley lightweight scope mounts, a leupold vx-3hd 3.5-10x40 firedot, and an empty mag the gun weighs in at 5lbs 15oz. Even though the bare gun weight was a little disappointing I am pretty happy with that total weight including the scope.
I haven’t had a chance to shoot it yet and probably won’t for another couple weeks, but if it shoots decent I’ll keep it. I’ll try to update this thread with a range report when I get a chance to shoot it.
In conclusion I have to admit that I don’t feel this rifle is worth anywhere near its price tag. The fit and finish of this gun is MUCH closer to a savage axis or ruger American than it is to one of the kimber ultralights. I understand things like not using metal for the trigger guard to save weight, but even the plastic there has sharp edges and mould flashing that wasn’t cleaned off. I would feel much more justified in the price tag if it had a more rigid stock, the one it comes with is just unforgivable on a $1k+ rifle.