Are some percentage of the tags in WY for a given high demand unit random or is it pure points?
There are a small number of "random" draw tags in most units. Some units with very low tag quotas will not give out a random draw tag though.
Are some percentage of the tags in WY for a given high demand unit random or is it pure points?
Are some percentage of the tags in WY for a given high demand unit random or is it pure points?
Nope, according to the 2015 demand report the NR special GEN tag was not drawn by anyone as a 2nd choice as there were more 1st choice applicants than tags (1221 for 551 tags, or 45%). The random part of the draw was the same way (669 for 397 tags) so not everyone drew it as a 1st choice either. It was a sure thing 2 years ago, not anymore and I'm guessing it will only get worse. That's why WY needs to have bow and gun specific tags.
So where do you find the correct draw odds for gen and doe/fawn tags?The mistake most make is to look at the demand report. It's not accurate for Gen tags nor doe/fawn tags.
Special gen was and has been, 100% for every app that has applied for it as a 1st choice, regardless of points.
2015 was the first year that a Special gen was not 100% as a 2nd choice, with odds being just a tick over 50%.
2016 will see addl 1st choice apps and the result will be a drop of 2nd choice odds. Based on past years app trends, those odds may be close to 0.0%
The GEN tag is and works just like any other tag, the odds are the odds no different than a unit specific tag. The number of 1st choice applicants are those who put GEN as a 1st choice. Not sure where you came up with the idea that they are not, please explain. This isn't the AZ draw, it's pretty simple for tags that exceed demand.
The GEN tag is and works just like any other tag, the odds are the odds no different than a unit specific tag. The number of 1st choice applicants are those who put GEN as a 1st choice. Not sure where you came up with the idea that they are not, please explain. This isn't the AZ draw, it's pretty simple for tags that exceed demand.
The demand report shows total nonresident quota before they get broken down into landowner draw with points, landowner draw random, special draw with points, special draw random, regular with points, then regular random. Simple right?
The legislature doesn't not set quotas or allocations of quotas. The Game and Fish Commission does. I quoted the draw split flow chart. I'm not in the office and can't quote it off memory. I did leave a message with the person in charge to see if I can post the draw split flow chart. It will help dispell the rumors and misinformation.This is incorrect.
The demand reports correctly show the quotas up to the end of the 2nd phase of the nr draw. What it doesn't show is the quota balance required to meet the nr allocation of full priced tags as determined by the legislature. That quota is independent of the quota set by the game dept.
The legislature has set nr full price elk tags at 7,250 irrespective of what the commission sets.
The elk draw flow chart, created for the outfitter association, has nothing to do with the point in time when the demand report is created. The Antelope draw report was created for me.
If you would like to learn the nr draw process and how it relates to the demand reports I suggest you ask questions and take notes.
Gee thanks for the tip. Hilarious!I suggest you have a discussion with Jean Cole and ask her for the Elk quota balance report so you have the needed information in hand to understand the process and at what point in the process the demand report is created.
Gee thanks for the tip. Hilarious!