Dont get to high on that horse they dont call them accubombs for nothing
Ok, why do "they" call them Accubonbs? mtmuley
Dont get to high on that horse they dont call them accubombs for nothing
Ok, why do "they" call them Accubonbs? mtmuley
Please don’t misunderstand, as I’m not trying to bash anybody or be condescending... but, I think a lot of people set unrealistic expectations of how these bullets (or any LR bullet) should perform at relatively close distances/high impact velocity (this may be due to marketing hype and/or a lack of knowledge of the product [again, not trying to be condescending here]). Honestly, punching through the “leg bone” (I’m assuming the knuckle based on the expectation of the shot placement being lethal?) of an elk under 200 yds then making it into the chest cavity with satisfactory performance is a tall order for just about any bullet, let alone a bullet designed for LR hunting.
When selecting a bullet I think there are a couple things to consider to ensure you are not disappointed with performance...
- How far are you really going to be shooting? If you don’t intend to shoot beyond 500 yds with most common hunting cartridges, then there really isn’t a NEED for a LR bullet. On the contrary, if there is a possibility of a long shot there is definitely a NEED for a LR bullet.
- How do you want the bullet to perform? ( do you want high weight retention, perfect mushroom, and 2 holes? Or are you comfortable with a more frangible bullet that “dumps” all its energy inside the cavity? )
.... just like everything in life, there is always some give and take and bullets are no different ... No LR hunting bullet is going to consistently give you that intact, high weight retention, mushroomed bullet with an exit hole in close (higher impact velocities).... just like you cannot count on an accubond opening at 1,000 yds (lower impact velocity)
After several big game animals taken both long and in close (as close as 30 yds), I have been very satisfied with the performance of the ELD-X (and ELD-M).... But I want a LR bullet.... and while the ELD’s don’t perform like an accubond in close they’ll still penetrate through a scapula and take out the vitals, which is adequate for me. Matter of fact, I actually prefer the way they “dump” their energy in the cavity rather than the high weight retention and exit hole of an accubond. They’re definitely not for everyone, but I like them.
Hmmm... I've been using them to kill stuff for about 16 years in a few different cartridges. I'll keep that in mind though. And, I saw the theory of energy "dump" mentioned. That always gives me a chuckle. mtmuleythey blow up on shoulders seen it 3 times on white tail does but then seen them kill a bunch to all bullets fail if you ask enough people
Please don’t misunderstand, as I’m not trying to bash anybody or be condescending... but, I think a lot of people set unrealistic expectations of how these bullets (or any LR bullet) should perform at relatively close distances/high impact velocity (this may be due to marketing hype and/or a lack of knowledge of the product [again, not trying to be condescending here]). Honestly, punching through the “leg bone” (I’m assuming the knuckle based on the expectation of the shot placement being lethal?) of an elk under 200 yds then making it into the chest cavity with satisfactory performance is a tall order for just about any bullet, let alone a bullet designed for LR hunting.
When selecting a bullet I think there are a couple things to consider to ensure you are not disappointed with performance...
- How far are you really going to be shooting? If you don’t intend to shoot beyond 500 yds with most common hunting cartridges, then there really isn’t a NEED for a LR bullet. On the contrary, if there is a possibility of a long shot there is definitely a NEED for a LR bullet.
- How do you want the bullet to perform? ( do you want high weight retention, perfect mushroom, and 2 holes? Or are you comfortable with a more frangible bullet that “dumps” all its energy inside the cavity? )
.... just like everything in life, there is always some give and take and bullets are no different ... No LR hunting bullet is going to consistently give you that intact, high weight retention, mushroomed bullet with an exit hole in close (higher impact velocities).... just like you cannot count on an accubond opening at 1,000 yds (lower impact velocity)
After several big game animals taken both long and in close (as close as 30 yds), I have been very satisfied with the performance of the ELD-X (and ELD-M).... But I want a LR bullet.... and while the ELD’s don’t perform like an accubond in close they’ll still penetrate through a scapula and take out the vitals, which is adequate for me. Matter of fact, I actually prefer the way they “dump” their energy in the cavity rather than the high weight retention and exit hole of an accubond. They’re definitely not for everyone, but I like them.
I just picked up a new Mountain Ascent in 6.5 Creedmoor and went through a mini-break-in process at the range last week.
This was my last group at 300 yards with the 143gr ELD-X factory "Precision Hunter" load.
The rifle seems to like them. I am hoping the animals don't like them at all!
View attachment 83196
These seem to hold potential as a factory load for the creedmoor. Hoping mine likes as well as yours.
The factory PH in 6.5 was a little slower than I would like and/or expect. My 8 shot average MV was 2629. That is out of a 22" barrel with a muzzle break. With a single revolution custom turret, that gets me out to 580 yards, which is about all I'd want to shoot at for hunting applications. I was definitely impressed with the 300yd group for an out of the box rifle and factory ammo.
Dont get to high on that horse they dont call them accubombs for nothing
they blow up on shoulders seen it 3 times on white tail does but then seen them kill a bunch to all bullets fail if you ask enough people
they blow up on shoulders seen it 3 times on white tail does but then seen them kill a bunch to all bullets fail if you ask enough people
what cartridge ,bullet weight, shot distance. Any pictures??
I've been shooting them since 2004 with no complaints. Killed a bull this year with one out of a .325 WSM.
- - - Updated - - -
That's funny because I would have expected them to blow up on the elk I shot this year since they are much bigger and tougher than whitetail. Two through the shoulder and no blow ups. One exited, one didn't
It's asking a lot from a bullet out of two fairly quick cartridges at closer ranges for them not to explode when shooting heavy bone and muscle. Partitions, A-Frames, and Mono bullets are about all I'd expect to give exit holes being driven that hard while shooting shoulders that close.one was a 264 win mag with 140 at 150 yards or so. another with a 270 dont know bullet weight distance was 80 yards. . No pictures. Also witnessed both those guns kill does at same range same distance with no problem. A few years back when deer numbers were way up we each had up wards of six plus tags so saw lots of bullets and killing. If the animal is dead i dont know if you can call it a failure or just didnt perform as expected.
What makes you think its not a good elk bullet?I shot 2 whitetails with a 143gr eldx out of a 6.5 creedmoor this season. both one shot kills, I did recover one of the bullets. I came away with that the eldx is probably a good deer bullet, but not an elk bullet. just my .02
It's asking a lot from a bullet out of two fairly quick cartridges at closer ranges for them not to explode when shooting heavy bone and muscle. Partitions, A-Frames, and Mono bullets are about all I'd expect to give exit holes being driven that hard while shooting shoulders that close.
What makes you think its not a good elk bullet?
Buddy and his dad both shot elk this year and last with the bullet.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk