Help - tikka decision

[Oldffemt]

The short mags have less mass and have a faster burn rate.

I can tell a noticable difference in reloader 20 vs reloader 25, and likewise ramshot hunter vs ramshot magnum in my 300 win mag, the faster powders have a shorter faster recoil impulse. Having a good slow burn with a long heavy barrel really does a lot to tame 300 win mag.

I do hunt with a 270 win, and appreciate it. But i also respect the wind drift resistance and energy retention of heavy bullets from 300 win mag. Your in the minority thinking it is unshootable. It is very common here for elk. Of course body size and muscle mass do play a factor in how much recoil wallops someone. No different that people from low elevation flat land struggling to pack elk out over rough terrain at 10,000 feet.

Well, how big a boy are ya? Never said a 300 anything was unshootable. I’ve spent some time with 300 win as well and recognize the difference between 300win and wsm recoil. You’re right that the win mag recoil impulse can be less sharp. Most hunters don’t shoot at long enough range to ever see the wind resistance of heavy 30 cal bullets. From what I’m seeing with my new 6.5 prc, I question the need, especially for someone who hasn’t purchased the rifle yet and as op stated, has never shot a lightweight 300 magnum.
My point is, if op hasn’t dropped the $$ on a lightweight magnum, it may be a good idea to look at something a little less sporty. If elk are the primary target, fine. Plenty have been killed with anything from a .243 and up. If it’s my money, I’m spending it on something that I can afford to shoot and that won’t beat the sh*t out of me when I’m practicing. Of course, I also believe that my manhood is not tied to the size of my cartridge in any way and elk tend to die when I shoot at them, even with my creedmoor.
A fast twist 243ai will be my next experiment.

 

[270-300]

Well, how big a boy are ya? Never said a 300 anything was unshootable. I’ve spent some time with 300 win as well and recognize the difference between 300win and wsm recoil. You’re right that the win mag recoil impulse can be less sharp. Most hunters don’t shoot at long enough range to ever see the wind resistance of heavy 30 cal bullets. From what I’m seeing with my new 6.5 prc, I question the need, especially for someone who hasn’t purchased the rifle yet and as op stated, has never shot a lightweight 300 magnum.
My point is, if op hasn’t dropped the $$ on a lightweight magnum, it may be a good idea to look at something a little less sporty. If elk are the primary target, fine. Plenty have been killed with anything from a .243 and up. If it’s my money, I’m spending it on something that I can afford to shoot and that won’t beat the sh*t out of me when I’m practicing. Of course, I also believe that my manhood is not tied to the size of my cartridge in any way and elk tend to die when I shoot at them, even with my creedmoor.
A fast twist 243ai will be my next experiment.

The op already has a 270. Hes looking for magnum to complement it. No one has ever said 300 win mag is needed for white tails.

 

[Axlrod]

The short mags have less mass and have a faster burn rate.

I can tell a noticable difference in reloader 20 vs reloader 25, and likewise ramshot hunter vs ramshot magnum in my 300 win mag, the faster powders have a shorter faster recoil impulse. Having a good slow burn with a long heavy barrel really does a lot to tame 300 win mag.

I do hunt with a 270 win, and appreciate it. But i also respect the wind drift resistance and energy retention of heavy bullets from 300 win mag. Your in the minority thinking it is unshootable. It is very common here for elk. Of course body size and muscle mass do play a factor in how much recoil wallops someone. No different that people from low elevation flat land struggling to pack elk out over rough terrain at 10,000 feet.

The difference is Reloder 20 is imaginary!
Your posts are pure nonsence.
You have stated on different threads that you only shoot your gun 10 times/year. And you are on pace to hit 4526 posts about shooting in your first year here?? Seems like you might know a whole lot more about posting, than you do about shooting.

 

[Macintosh]

You guys are off in the rough arguing about micro-level stuff, and totally missing the bigger point. We dont even know if OP is reloading at all, and we really have no idea the distance at which he’s looking to use the gun on game. All we know is he wanted a 300magnum of some sort for some reason, he already owns a 270win, he’s probably not getting a suppressor soon, and he’s agonizing over 22 vs 24” barrels. The point made was 2” of barrel length isnt going to make enough of a difference, all other things being equal, to override the other factors in deciding which gun to buy. Slow powder or fast, I call “total BS” on anyone who says they can shoot the difference between those two barrels, or see a terminal difference between those two barrels at any range less than “way tf out there”. And probably total bs even then.

Re suppressor length barrels: yes, pretty much always, shortening a barrel slows the projectile compared to same load in a longer barrel. Yes, that turns a 300mag into a 30-06 and then a 308. Yes, that sometimes results in a fireball. Question is why people think that matters? The suppressor eats up your fireball. If the velocity lost matters because you are ACTUALLY dropping below required terminal velocity for a specific bullet to upset at a range you are capable of shooting at game (reliably)—well then great, thats a reason to get a longer barrel. Otherwise, you didnt need that velocity anyway, so unless you are going to adjust the cartridge down to the level you actually need, who cares?? If, after chopping the barrel another cartridge achieves getting the projectile you want to use to the same distance at the speed you want, then by all means try that instead if theres a benefit such as recoil, etc.