LightFoot
WKR
Hey everyone, new Rokslider here!
I’m located on Vancouver Island, BC, Canada and getting into hunting. I’d start with blacktail deer, but would hope to eventually (as soon as experience and opportunity presents) move towards larger game such as elk, and in a few years moose.
I’ve talked to 5 or so local hunting/firearm shops all with conflicting calibre opinions. I would love to hear your opinions/experiences on these two calibres and I am all ears to other suggestions.
The first being the .270, which I know is to small for moose, questionable for elk depending who you ask, and great for deer. If I were to go this route I know I would need a larger second calibre rifle later on. Which if possible I would like to avoid for now, but understand it might be my only choice. Would this ethically allow me to hunt elk?
The second being the .300 win mag, will kill everything with proper utilization on the hunters behalf. The problem I’ve read is potential meat loss on smaller deer (which I’ve heard can be negated with the right choice of ammunition). This option is appealing as I can master one rifle, one round. But wonder if this is stupidly overkill for my needs, or risking meat loss?
I’ve shot 30-06 and .308 and had no problem with recoil, I understand the win mag hits a but harder but imagine I would be fine? At least with a limbsavor.
I understand the value of shot placement over calibre, and would never take a shot I wasn’t confident in.
If you’ve made it this far into my ramblings, thanks for reading! Look forward to hearing your thoughts.
-J
The 300 win (or any other .30 mag) is probably the best do-all North American cartridge.
The “meat damage” is a silly arguments to me. One animal loss to inadequate bullet will me more meat loss than the some of any blood-shot ammo from your .300 mag.
That said, the .270 Win is more than adequate for elk and moose and reasonable ranges with heavy constructed bullet.
Good luck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro