Doubtful. Should have left out the elevation and merely stated it was a rugged hunt with a lot of bumps and jostling.Does elevation have an effect on scopes?
To me that sounds like a quality issue with a single scope rather than an insufficiently robust design affecting the entire scope line. I think the OPs question is targeted at design. Catastrophic failure with less than 100 shots is still a horror story, especially if it happens on a hunt.To the OP, for what it’s worth, I tried to make that scope work. It lasted less than 100 rounds before failing catastrophically. So yea, I’d say the horror stories are true.
First one died in less than 100 rounds. Prior to that it did the typical “leupold shuffle” and took 5-ever to site in. The warranty replacement did the same “leupold shuffle” and would wander inside a 2 moa circle once it was finally sighted in. Couple that with lots of other personal leupold scope failures and I’ve since purged my collection of all gold rings and sleep better at night. My personal failure rate of leupold scopes is higher than I’ve experienced with vortex, and I don’t own a scope from either brand anymore.To me that sounds like a quality issue with a single scope rather than an insufficiently robust design affecting the entire scope line. I think the OPs question is targeted at design. Catastrophic failure with less than 100 shots is still a horror story, especially if it happens on a hunt.
This is my intent. My curiosity has me wondering where all the murmurings come from about “ L” being an inferior option.Or you can stop listening to .01% of all users of Leopold optics on this forum and go kill game and not worry about it.
Im going to be testing h4350,h4381sc adg brass fed 215sNot to get too far off topic but, @Jfjfrye what load did you go with for your 300WSM?
I concure with HighUintas. We provided a couple "how not to drop test" and the Mavens survived. I would suggest to err on the side of extra padding up front. I personally had to go back and verify the rifle/ring setup was good to go. IE use known quality rings, degrease and torque everything to suggested specs, etc. That is to say, even if you have a "failure" w the Leupold, I would suggest it doesn't mean much unless you have proofed the rifle/system w a known scope.You should read my Maven rs1.2 thread and learn from it. Use a soft surface underneath your drop mat. Either I really suck at shooting, the rs1.2 is really solid, or I got really lucky.
Remind me not to buy a rifle off this guy!Bit of testing included .
R
Film it, or people will question your results (if you care to share your results)Yes I probably will do that. And should do it. Am I wrong for assuming there is some information out there on this topic?
I know a guy who took his scope off and tried to shoot down the barrel like a shotgun on a bedded buck that wouldn’t budge after a lot of shooting… it didn’t work, but may be worth practicing if you decide on a leupoldI once went on a 4 day trip shooting pigs ,roos and foxes spotlighting with a mate that brought a brand new vx6 hd ( the very first trip with it). By the end of the 3rd day the scope was completely useless every shot from his 220 swift knocked it off probably 4 moa. Tried re-mounting and everything but it was just busted. This is only driving around paddocks with it next to your leg in the front seat or in your lap.
Wondering if you usually let other people tell you if your scope/equipment works correctly?Can anyone point me to a thread talking about leupold Vx5hd and why they are not reliable and any posts about drop testing on this scope….. the search bar has left me with no success.
I would, looks pretty solidRemind me not to buy a rifle off this guy!
Yea that's back country on stock also... not riding in a truckGot three vx5 HD's. packed one all season mounted on my 300 ultra mag and killed two elk at 450+ with Barnes 190eldx for what that is worth. Checked zero at the end of season at it was still on.