- Thread Starter
- #21
TXCO
WKR
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2012
- Messages
- 903
Interesting thoughts and obviously there are lots of different situations. If we assume that it is a solo ram and was judged legal by the guide, shot and then deemed illegal by the game department, is it always going to fall on who took the shot from a court stand point?
Does the hunter then subject themselves to Lacey violations if they bring an animal home across state/country lines? I think thats how theyve gotten a lot of the tv personalities in Alaska retroactively. Its such a shame to rely on someone and even if its an honest mistake on all parties to have the situation go horribly wrong. Sadly we have to have firm lines for a reason or else they would get crosses all the time. (no sympathy if it was mailicous)
Does the hunter then subject themselves to Lacey violations if they bring an animal home across state/country lines? I think thats how theyve gotten a lot of the tv personalities in Alaska retroactively. Its such a shame to rely on someone and even if its an honest mistake on all parties to have the situation go horribly wrong. Sadly we have to have firm lines for a reason or else they would get crosses all the time. (no sympathy if it was mailicous)
Last edited: