Grizzly bear killed in Unit 6

Fujicon

FNG
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
93
Unless I jump scare a black bear or run into a mom and cubs I've never been too worried about them. Just always cautious, so I guess I'm a little surprised at that but it makes sense.
Yes, almost seems non-intuitive, but typically it's those mamas with cubs. Honestly, I can't say whether the same stats still hold true today since I read that some years ago and it surprised me when I read it, thus it stuck in my head. I also remember the same article said that Japan had the third highest number of bear attacks in the world, which also caught me by surprise.
 

Wingshooter

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
120
Location
OH
I think wolves and all bears are cool and should be part of that mountainous terrain. But like others have stated they should be managed through hunting so they don't hear rifle shots or old men picking huckleberry's and think of a dinner bell. Without a structured hunt we are just slow pieces of meat that on occasion are properly armed and don't get mauled like the 72 year old in great falls there a week or so ago.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
Messages
24
Location
SNorth Idaho
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
1,070
Location
north idaho
I'm from pa so I don't understand or have much knowledge on the situation, why are grizzlies hated so much? Are they that mean and nasty? I've always thought they're part of the ecosystem as long as they're managed then for the most part they're just bears doing bear things.
it is not so much the animal, but the laws pertaning to the animal. For me, access rules to the forest change because of them. I am not worried about the animal, just don't like being told i can not go somewhere anymore because they are making a comeback. ie snowmobile access in winter in north idaho has changed due to them coming out of there dens in april. Some place i have snowmobiled for decades, i can't legally go there in april anymore, even know, there are more bears now, than 5 years ago.
 

Pacific_Fork

Well Known Rokslider
Joined
May 26, 2019
Messages
1,260
Location
North Idaho
it is not so much the animal, but the laws pertaning to the animal. For me, access rules to the forest change because of them. I am not worried about the animal, just don't like being told i can not go somewhere anymore because they are making a comeback. ie snowmobile access in winter in north idaho has changed due to them coming out of there dens in april. Some place i have snowmobiled for decades, i can't legally go there in april anymore, even know, there are more bears now, than 5 years ago.

I didn’t even know that and I live up here, probably because I don’t own a sled.

What do they say exactly harms them if coming out of the dens and someone is riding a sled around? Stress that leads to them dying?
 

nsimmons

FNG
Joined
Aug 27, 2023
Messages
19
it is not so much the animal, but the laws pertaning to the animal. For me, access rules to the forest change because of them. I am not worried about the animal, just don't like being told i can not go somewhere anymore because they are making a comeback. ie snowmobile access in winter in north idaho has changed due to them coming out of there dens in april. Some place i have snowmobiled for decades, i can't legally go there in april anymore, even know, there are more bears now, than 5 years ago.
I didn't even know that was a thing I figured everyone just continued per usual and there were just grizzlies added to the mix.
 

Rotnguns

WKR
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
387
Location
Southwest Idaho
Would love to see more griz in Idaho - even repopulated into the Sawtooths, White Clouds, and the Lost River range. BUT: they need to have a hunting season; even with a quota of only several a year. The reason is that this species has demonstrated that they will treat us as a prey animal - it's why we wiped out most of them years ago. I think we're seeing more attacks in more areas, especially in Idaho, because there are actually more griz in more areas than we realize, and also because after decades of protected status, they are losing their legacy respect and fear of humans.
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2017
Messages
455
Location
Idaho
IDFG ended their investigation into this matter. Apparently, the hunter had shown a trail cam pic of this bear to the local IDFG reps, who told him it was a black bear, so he went back to his bait and shot it.... Story on their home page.
Several months later in case anyone’s wondering, the officer didn’t lose their job. If this was another state they’d be down a person guaranteed.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
480
Location
Montana
Yes. However, more people are killed by blacks than by grizzlies for the simple reason there are far more human-bear encounters involving blacks, not that blacks are more aggressive.
Not in Montana by my count of our fatal bear attacks in the last 10 years it's 6-1 grizzlies over blacks
 

Rotnguns

WKR
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
387
Location
Southwest Idaho
Several months later in case anyone’s wondering, the officer didn’t lose their job. If this was another state they’d be down a person guaranteed.
Mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, it was an honest mistake on the officer's part. On the other hand, if a hunter makes the same mistake, they get charged with a crime and fined, often quite heavily. I like how IDFG quickly owned their mistake and issued an apology.
 

IDVortex

WKR
Joined
Jan 16, 2024
Messages
1,288
Location
CDA Idaho
Mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, it was an honest mistake on the officer's part. On the other hand, if a hunter makes the same mistake, they get charged with a crime and fined, often quite heavily. I like how IDFG quickly owned their mistake and issued an apology.
But, they should still be held accountable. Considering, they should be setting the example... but here we are.
 
Top