So, I was just blathering on some poor OPs post and the thought occurred to me that I've been considering what the hunting implications may be for this Greater Idaho proposal where about 3/4 of southern and Eastern Oregon are considering becoming part of Idaho.
I understand that this is much more politically expedient for them than trying to create a new state and I understood why they're tired of being ruled by people in Portland but, all of those discussions aside, let's get to the meat of the matter.
Is this possible inclusion of the majority of Oregon intonthe state of Idaho going to create more or fewer hunting opportunities for the residents of what is now Idaho?
Say, for the most part, the IDFG manages things mostly the same, are there going to be fewer hunters per square mile or more? Is there a lot of good hunting in Southern and Eastern Oregon? Is there very much public land in these parts or Oregon? Do their timber companies play well with others?
I'm very interested in how to consider this proposal and need more information?
Cross
I understand that this is much more politically expedient for them than trying to create a new state and I understood why they're tired of being ruled by people in Portland but, all of those discussions aside, let's get to the meat of the matter.
Is this possible inclusion of the majority of Oregon intonthe state of Idaho going to create more or fewer hunting opportunities for the residents of what is now Idaho?
Say, for the most part, the IDFG manages things mostly the same, are there going to be fewer hunters per square mile or more? Is there a lot of good hunting in Southern and Eastern Oregon? Is there very much public land in these parts or Oregon? Do their timber companies play well with others?
I'm very interested in how to consider this proposal and need more information?
Cross