Getting into ML

[OXN939]

150 yards max with a scoped muzzy?! Surely you’re joking @OXN939!

Absolutely! Here are a few reasons why.

1. This thread is about a brand new hunter asking for advice, not a guy with over 30 muzzleloaders.

2. Even among experienced blackpowder hunters, most setups in the field today are not capable of ethically killing much past 200. Take a Thor 250 out of a CVA Accura, a common CO legal setup that OP mentioned. Even with a redlined load, that projectile is moving slower than bullets from many compact handguns by 250.

3. Even if you do gain years' worth of experience blackpowder hunting, spend several thousand dollars on a custom setup with ultra high BC bullets, and make a perfect shot from a field expedient position using irons on a target 400 yards away, the ballistic performance you can expect goes from "outright unethical" to "alright." Advertising long range muzzleloader hunting to brand new shooters is a lot like Cam Hanes posting videos of himself shooting 100 yards on instagram. If we knew the exact number of elk this year that were injured by a kid who watched a bunch of videos like that, bought a bow online, practiced for a month and then confidently sent a shot at an animal at about three times their realistic MER, we would collectively be sick.

So yep. 150 and in for me with my smokepoles. Make muzzleloader hunting primitive again.

 

[ElDiablito]

Absolutely! Here are a few reasons why.

1. This thread is about a brand new hunter asking for advice, not a guy with over 30 muzzleloaders.

2. Even among experienced blackpowder hunters, most setups in the field today are not capable of ethically killing much past 200. Take a Thor 250 out of a CVA Accura, a common CO legal setup that OP mentioned. Even with a redlined load, that projectile is moving slower than bullets from many compact handguns by 250.

3. Even if you do gain years' worth of experience blackpowder hunting, spend several thousand dollars on a custom setup with ultra high BC bullets, and make a perfect shot from a field expedient position using irons on a target 400 yards away, the ballistic performance you can expect goes from "outright unethical" to "alright." Advertising long range muzzleloader hunting to brand new shooters is a lot like Cam Hanes posting videos of himself shooting 100 yards on instagram. If we knew the exact number of elk this year that were injured by a kid who watched a bunch of videos like that, bought a bow online, practiced for a month and then confidently sent a shot at an animal at about three times their realistic MER, we would collectively be sick.

So yep. 150 and in for me with my smokepoles. Make muzzleloader hunting primitive again.

That’s one way to look at it. Here’s another.

[Caveat: Every hunter should be familiar and proficient with their equipment and know their (and their bullet’s) maximum range. If a guy isn’t comfortable\capable past 150 yards he shouldn’t be shooting further.]

If you're shooting a scoped muzzy, you’re not hunting CO and you can likely shoot a higher performance saboted bullet.

But let’s look at a pretty standard chart for an average 250 gr bullet (Thor with a Bc of .220) with a mv of 2000 fps. Almost 1100 ft/lbs of energy is plenty for deer-sized game at 250 yards.

 

[Mtndawger]

That’s one way to look at it. Here’s another.

[Caveat: Every hunter should be familiar and proficient with their equipment and know their (and their bullet’s) maximum range. If a guy isn’t comfortable\capable past 150 yards he shouldn’t be shooting further.]

If you're shooting a scoped muzzy, you’re not hunting CO and you can likely shoot a higher performance saboted bullet.

But let’s look at a pretty standard chart for an average 250 gr bullet (Thor with a Bc of .220) with a mv of 2000 fps. Almost 1100 ft/lbs of energy is plenty for deer-sized game at 250 yards.

View attachment 791373

1700 fps with 100 gr 777 is more realistic muzzle velocity from a 26” barrel 50 caliber 250 grain from a Cva

 

[Mtndawger]

I really do wish Colorado would change their rules on caliber. I think a .45 caliber would be every bit as good on elk, maybe better. Higher velocity and flatter trajectory.

 

[ElDiablito]

1700 fps with 100 gr 777 is more realistic muzzle velocity from a 26” barrel 50 caliber 250 grain from a Cva

Why limit yourself to 100 gr? Max load on most modern inlines is 150 grV (except Bh209 which is 120 grV).

It’s easy to hit 2000 fps with 777 and a 250 gr bullet.

 

[OXN939]

(Thor with a Bc of .220)

Their website says a BC of .205. So that gives you an anemic 1200 FPS at 250 yards. And that's redlining your rifle- tough to shoot well, recoils like a lightweight belted magnum, usually doesn't group as well as lighter loads, and makes spotting shots close to impossible.

Could accept that. Or you could hunt the way muzzleloader seasons were intended.

 

[ElDiablito]

Their website says a BC of .205. So that gives you an anemic 1200 FPS at 250 yards. And that's redlining your rifle- tough to shoot well, recoils like a lightweight belted magnum, usually doesn't group as well as lighter loads, and makes spotting shots close to impossible.

Could accept that. Or you could hunt the way muzzleloader seasons were intended.

Ok - let’s run it with .205. Doesn’t change anything. That would be 1370 fps at 250.

 

[ElDiablito]

Their website says a BC of .205. So that gives you an anemic 1200 FPS at 250 yards. And that's redlining your rifle- tough to shoot well, recoils like a lightweight belted magnum, usually doesn't group as well as lighter loads, and makes spotting shots close to impossible.

Could accept that. Or you could hunt the way muzzleloader seasons were intended.

Send me a pm. I’ll get you lined out on a high performance modern muzzleloader!

 

[Str8shooter]

New to Muzz you should be considering closer to 100 or 120 max on live animals and that's after a substantial commitment in time and practice. 250 yds with a unscoped muzzleloader is maybe more equivalent to 90 or 95 yds with a bow. Even if you drop big money on a higher end gun, and a couple hundred bucks on powder and quality bullets getting your drops right at the range, 250 yds on wild animals in hunting scenarios simply isn't a reasonable range for a new shooter to attain. Shooting in low light, in field positions and with elevated heart rates on live animals doubles (or more) your calm, prone, bench shooting group sizes. CVA, Knight and obviously custom guns can print 3 inch or smaller 100 yd groups but linear extrapolation of that to a 6 inch group at 200 yds doesnt apply in hunting conditions. Some of the best muzz shooters I know rarely if ever take a poke over 200, and that's on elk and with close to 20 yrs experience. All that being said, BH 209 is legit and don't be afraid to check out the copper projectiles, thor and borlocks smack animals into the chest freezer realm. For entry level the CVA optima is a great rifle.

 

[Wrench]

At 500 yards my bullet is going 800fps. I have put a bullet lengthwise through a whitetail with an 800fps 45lc. You can look at any of the videos that I've posted and see that it just takes a little practice to make hits way off. I just posted a few videos dusting clays at 300 shooting off of a folded gun case off the hood.....no different than shooting off my pack.

My biggest concern is the time of flight.

 

[wyosam]

I really do wish Colorado would change their rules on caliber. I think a .45 caliber would be every bit as good on elk, maybe better. Higher velocity and flatter trajectory.

The goal isn’t to maximize range, they are running a hunt with intended limitations.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk